MIDAS GOLD AGREES TO C$9.8 MILLION PRIVATE PLACEMENT

Funds for continuing evaluation of and a PFS on the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) (“Midas Gold” or the “Company”) today announced that it has agreed to undertake a C$9,809,800 non-brokered private placement (the “Placement”) with Teck Resources Limited (TSX; TCK.A and TCK.B; NYSE: TCK) (“Teck”) whereby Teck will subscribe for 12,740,000 common shares of Midas Gold (“Shares”) at a price of $0.77 per Share, which represents a 10% premium to the 5-day volume-weighted average trading price of the Shares and a 5% premium to the closing price on June 28, 2013. Teck currently holds no shares of Midas Gold. It is anticipated that Teck will own approximately 9.9% of the shares outstanding upon closing of the Placement. Proceeds of the Placement will be used to continue the evaluation of Midas Gold’s Golden Meadows Gold Project located in Idaho, USA, and for general working capital purposes.

“Following on the recent transaction with Franco-Nevada Corporation, Teck’s investment in Midas Gold represents the second endorsement of the potential of the Golden Meadows gold-antimony-silver project in Idaho by a major mining house,” said Stephen Quin, President & CEO of Midas Gold. “This financing will allow us to make the necessary commitments to support the delivery of our key objectives of (1) updating the mineral resources estimates for the Golden Meadows Project to incorporate substantial amounts of new data collected in 2012-13, (2) complete a pre-feasibility study based on the updated mineral resource estimates and incorporate updated designs, concepts and engineering in the first half of 2014 and, if warranted, (3) subsequently prepare and submit a plan of operations to initiate the preparation of an environmental impact statement by the appropriate regulators.” In parallel with these key objectives, Midas Gold continues to collect baseline environmental information, evaluate the legacy environmental disturbance from prior mining activities on site and opportunities to remediate and restore those disturbed areas in conjunction with potential mining activities, if and when such occur.

No finder’s fees or commissions will be paid in connection with the Placement. The Shares issued to Teck will be restricted from trading for a period of four months following the closing date. The Placement is subject to applicable regulatory approvals. Teck will have the right, but not the obligation, for as long as it owns at least 5% of the issued and outstanding shares in Midas Gold, to participate in any future equity financings to the extent of its percentage ownership in Midas Gold’s share capital at the time of such financing.

In response to continued poor market conditions for resource equities, Midas Gold continues to focus on reducing expenditures and overheads while delivering its core objectives as cost-effectively as possible; the Company undertook significant staff reductions in December 2012 and March 2013 and is currently working to close its US subsidiary’s Spokane office, consolidating its technical personnel and activities in Idaho. “Midas Gold will continue to look for opportunities to reduce costs across the organization and ensure funds are cost-effectively focused on the Company’s key priorities of mineral resource updates and completion of a pre-feasibility study and, if warranted, preparation of a plan of operations to initiate the mine operation permitting process,” said Mr. Quin. “With this additional funding in place, Midas Gold anticipates it will be funded to meet its key objectives through the end of 2014, providing some certainty and stability to project activities through this critical period.”

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow District

Midas Gold , through its wholly owned subsidiaries including Midas Gold Inc., MGI Acquisition Corporation and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of deposits in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates are detailed in a technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated effective August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) and filed on SEDAR on September 21, 2012, which is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long-life, low-cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to: information regarding the closing of the Placement and the Company’s use of the proceeds of the Placement; the Company’s planned cost-cutting measures; the Company’s expectation that it can complete certain key objectives with the proceeds of the Placement; disclosure that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on Midas Gold’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; and planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “suggest”, “optimize”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “anomalous”, “around”, “objective” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “should”, “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute Forward-Looking Information to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In disclosing Forward-Looking Information in this news release, the Company has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to: that the Placement will be completed on the terms disclosed in this news release; that certain of the Company’s key objectives can be completed at the cost expected; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others: risks normally associated with closing of a private placement; risks related to the availability of further financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Company’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Company’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Company’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licenses and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Company’s public disclosure record. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Company and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Company does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

MIDAS GOLD REPORTS RESULTS OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

Progress at the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho, Reviewed; Advances towards a PFS

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) (“Midas Gold” or the “Company”) today announced the results of its annual general meeting, which was held in Vancouver on May 14, 2013. Following the meeting, Chairman Peter Nixon, and President and CEO Stephen Quin, provided those present with a brief overview of the Company’s progress over the past twelve months and its plans going forward, highlights of which are summarized below.

“Midas Gold has made significant progress on a number of fronts at its Golden Meadows Project over the past year, which progress has not been reflected in its share price performance, which has largely been influenced by poor market conditions,” said Stephen Quin, President & CEO. “Midas Gold appreciates the support of its shareholders and intends to continue advancing its Golden Meadows gold-silver-antimony-tungsten project in Idaho through to completion of a more robust, thorough evaluation of its economic potential, while ensuring financial resources are most effectively deployed in light of the Company’s available cash and general market conditions.” Mr. Quin reminded attendees at the annual meeting that the Golden Meadows Project benefits from a large, high-grade mineral resource located in a low-risk jurisdiction that has the potential to support a long-life, low-cost, open-pit mining operation with significant production, as demonstrated in the Preliminary Economic Assessment published in September 2012. Further, he noted, Golden Meadows is a brownfields site that has been extensively mined for almost 100 years, and offers the potential for restoration of the area through reclamation of past disturbance contemporaneously with development of a new mine, designed to modern standards, resulting in an enhanced environmental outcome that should be an improvement on the current situation. “Our objective is to leave the site a better place than we found it,” said Mr. Quin.

Annual General Meeting

A total of 77.61 million common shares were represented at the meeting, or 67.60% of the votes attached to all outstanding shares. Shareholders voted in favour of the election of all director nominees as follows:

Nominee	Votes For	Votes Withheld	Total Votes Cast *	Percentage of Votes For	Percentage of Votes Withheld
Stephen Quin	73,991,426	2,583,202	77,605,694	95.24%	3.33%
Frederick Earnest	76,454,206	40,423	77,605,694	98.52%	0.05%
Wayne Hubert	76,404,206	90,423	77,605,694	98.45%	0.12%
Jerry Korpan	76,454,206	40,423	77,605,694	98.52%	0.05%
Peter Nixon	76,253,670	240,959	77,605,694	98.26%	0.31%
Michael Richings	76,454,206	40,423	77,605,694	98.52%	0.05%
John Wakeford	76,452,906	41,723	77,605,694	98.51%	0.05%
Donald Young	76,450,906	41,723	77,605,694	98.51%	0.05%

* Not all shares were voted in respect of all motions therefore the combined number of shares voted for or withheld may not add up to the total votes represented at the meeting.

The directors were elected to hold offices until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected or appointed.

The Company’s shareholders also approved the appointment of Deloitte LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 (100% voted in favour), an amendment to the Company’s articles to ensure the Company may use the notice-and-access method for sending meeting materials to shareholders (98.41% voted in favour); and amendments to the Company’s by-laws to include advance notice provisions (98.41% voted in favour).

Detailed voting results for the meeting are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Corporate Overview

Following the annual meeting, Mr. Quin gave an update on progress and activities at its Golden Meadows Project in Idaho. He noted that the core objective for the Company was to complete a more robust and comprehensive evaluation of the economic potential of the Golden Meadows Project, building on the results of the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) that were published in September 2012. Key areas of on-going activity include:

Design optimization of the conceptual Golden Meadows Project that was set out in the PEA, with a major focus on reclamation of existing historic disturbance and eventual restoration of the brownfields site, including enhancement of the local fishery, the re-establishment of fish passage upstream of existing barriers created by historic mining, and the development of wetlands in historically disturbed areas and on post-closure reclaimed areas.

Evaluation of the potential for reprocessing tailings deposited by historic milling operations conducted from the late 1920s through to the early 1950s, where assaying of recent geotechnical drilling confirmed past indications of potentially economically attractive grades in those tailings. Reprocessing of these materials may also assist with remediation of past mining disturbance through their removal from their current location and replacement in a lined tailings facility.

Comprehensive remodelling of geology of the mineral deposits that comprise the Golden Meadows Project, incorporating the results of Midas Gold’s approximately 35,000m of new resource-definition related drilling completed since the cut-off date used in the September 2012 PEA, as well as additional drill data recovered for holes completed pre-Midas Gold’s involvement in Golden Meadows.

Updated mineral resource estimates, utilizing the new geologic models and new drill data acquired since the date of the PEA mineral resource estimate, including additional data recovered from holes completed prior to Midas Gold’s involvement in the project. The objective of incorporating the additional drilling and data is to maximize conversion of a significant portion of the inferred resource into the indicated category in this resource update.

Utilizing the PEA mineral resource estimates as a base, optimization of pit scheduling (which deposit gets mined in what sequence, blending options, etc.), as well as evaluating the economic and environmental trade-offs of mining certain high strip ratio mineralization (such as the deeper portions of the Hangar Flats deposit) which yield only modest incremental cash flow in the PEA but generate substantial amounts of waste material - elimination of these more marginal ounces could result in a smaller project footprint and less sustaining capital (as the need for replacement of the mining fleet is reduced or eliminated).

Extensive metallurgical testing of mineralization from all three main deposits with the objective of optimizing economic performance, including grind size vs. recovery testing, options for enhanced flotation recoveries, pressure oxidation vs. bio-oxidation testing on concentrates, leaching optimization for oxides and oxidized concentrates, carbonate rejection work to reduce or eliminate the need for acidulation costs (capital and operating) when processing West End materials, options for historic tailings retreatment, and other such optimizations.

Trade-off studies looking at the economic, environmental and post-closure impacts of power supply options, process plant locations, access routes, etc.

Midas Gold is continually evaluating opportunities to reduce the environmental footprint of the project, while maintaining robust project economics, by evaluating opportunities to remediate, reclaim and restore the extensive disturbance from historic mining activities at the site. Midas Gold considers location, operation, closure and post-closure in the design of all aspects of the project, and the risks related thereto.

Mr. Quin also provided the meeting with some general comments on upcoming major project milestones noting that, with the additional funding in place from the recently completed transaction with Franco-Nevada, Midas Gold’s management and Board are evaluating the timing and prioritization of expenditures, looking to reduce costs while still delivering the Company’s major objectives in a timely manner. The major corporate objectives remain:

Completing updated mineral resource estimates for each of the mineral deposits incorporating substantial amounts of new data;

Completion of a pre-feasibility study (“PFS”) as opposed to the previously contemplated updated PEA; and

Completion and filing of a draft Plan of Operations thereafter.

As part of its cost controls, Midas Gold is planning to conduct more activities sequentially, as opposed to in parallel, which should yield cost efficiencies but a somewhat extended initial timeframe. This schedule will allow more time for meaningful stakeholder engagement, collection of additional field information, as well as more comprehensive design and engineering work, which should support completion of a PFS as opposed to the previously contemplated updated preliminary economic assessment. Midas Gold believes that there is potential for reduced timeframes for subsequent steps as the project would be more thoroughly defined and the timeframe would provide greater opportunities for consultation with regulators and stakeholders ahead of the initiation of any formal regulatory process, and incorporation of input from those consultations into final designs.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow District

Midas Gold , through its wholly owned subsidiaries including Midas Gold Inc., MGI Acquisition Corporation and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of deposits in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates are detailed in a technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated effective August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) and filed on SEDAR on September 21, 2012 is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long-life, low-cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on Midas Gold’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; and planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “suggest”, “optimize”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “anomalous”, “around”, “objective” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “should”, “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licenses and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

MIDAS GOLD COMPLETES US$15 MILLION TRANSACTION WITH FRANCO-NEVADA

Midas Adopts Majority Voting Policy for Directors

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (TSX:MAX) (“Midas Gold” or “Corporation”) today announced that it and its subsidiaries (the “Midas Group”) have completed the previously announced US$15.0 million transaction with Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV:TSX) (“Franco-Nevada”) and one of its subsidiaries whereby the Midas Group has sold certain rights to a royalty on future gold production from the Golden Meadows Project in Valley County, Idaho as well as two million warrants exercisable for shares of Midas Gold.

“We are pleased to have completed the US$15 million transactions with Franco-Nevada and its subsidiary,” said Stephen Quin, President & CEO of Midas Gold. “These funds allow us to continue advancing the evaluation of the world-class Golden Meadows gold-silver-antimony-tungsten project in Idaho. The Golden Meadows project benefits from a large, high-grade mineral resource located in a low-risk jurisdiction that has the potential to support a long-life, low-cost, open pit mining operation with significant production as demonstrated in the Preliminary Economic Assessment published in September 2012. The mineral resources and potential future development area are contained within a brownfields site that has been extensively mined for almost 100 years, and offers the potential for reclamation and restoration of past disturbance contemporaneously with development of a new mine, designed to modern standards, that results in an enhanced environmental outcome as compared to the current situation.”

Additional details of the transactions can be found in Midas Gold’s news release dated May 7, 2013.

Advisors

Haywood Securities Inc. acted as financial advisor to Midas Gold and its board of directors in respect of this transaction.

Majority Voting Policy

The board of directors of Midas Gold (the “Board”) has adopted a majority voting policy which requires, in an uncontested election of directors, that any nominee in respect of whom a greater number of votes “withheld” than votes “for” are validly cast will promptly submit his or her offer of resignation for the consideration of Midas Gold’s Corporate Governance Committee. The committee will make a recommendation to the Board after reviewing the matter as to whether to accept or reject the resignation. In considering the resignation offer, the committee and the Board will consider all factors they deem relevant, and the Board’s decision as to accept or reject the resignation offer will be disclosed to the public. A director who offers his or her resignation pursuant to the policy will not participate in any meeting of the Board or the committee at which the resignation offer is considered. The policy would not apply in circumstances involving contested director elections.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow District
Midas Gold , through its wholly owned subsidiaries including Midas Gold Inc., MGI Acquisition Corporation and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of deposits in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates are detailed in a technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated effective August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) and filed on SEDAR on September 21, 2012 is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long-life, low-cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on Midas Gold’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; and planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “suggest”, “optimize”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “anomalous” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licenses and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

MIDAS GOLD ENTERS INTO US$15 MILLION TRANSACTION WITH FRANCO-NEVADA

Provides Funding to Continue Advancing Golden Meadows Project in Idaho

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (TSX:MAX) (“Midas Gold”) today announced that it and its subsidiaries (the “Midas Group”) have entered into a US$15.0 million transaction with Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV:TSX) (“Franco-Nevada”) and one of its subsidiaries whereby the Midas Group has agreed to sell certain rights to a royalty on future gold production from the Golden Meadows Project in Valley County, Idaho (the “Agreement”), as well as a subscription agreement (the “Sub-Agreement”) for two million warrants exercisable for shares of Midas Gold.

“The transactions with Franco-Nevada and its subsidiary provide significant funding to continue advancing the evaluation of the world-class Golden Meadows gold-silver-antimony-tungsten project,” said Stephen Quin, President & CEO of Midas Gold. “We appreciate Franco-Nevada’s endorsement of the merits of the Golden Meadows Project and its potential to be a significant producer of gold and other metals.” Midas Gold intends to use the proceeds of the transactions to fund on-going mineral resource evaluation, metallurgical, engineering design, and environmental baseline data collection and evaluation at the Golden Meadows Project with a view to completing a prefeasibility study on the Golden Meadows Project and, if warranted, filing an application for the development of a mining operation, as well as for general working capital.

Transaction Summary
The subsidiaries of Midas Gold that hold the mineral title to the Golden Meadows Project (the “Vendor Group”) have entered into the Agreement with a subsidiary of Franco-Nevada (the “Payee”) whereby the Vendor Group has granted the Payee a perpetual 1.7% net smelter returns (“NSR”) royalty on any future gold production from the Golden Meadows Property, subject to the normal terms and conditions for such a royalty, in exchange for the sum of US$14.65 million. Importantly, the royalty excludes antimony, silver and other valuable by-products that may be produced from the Golden Meadows Property, if and when development proceeds.

The Midas Group has the right to repurchase one-third of the NSR royalty for the sum of US$9.0 million for three years from the closing of the transaction. In addition, the NSR royalty rate may be adjusted based on the capacity of the project, when and if approved by Midas Gold for development, if the approved mill throughput is different to the 20,000 tonnes per day scenario set out in the Preliminary Economic Assessment reported by Midas Gold in a news release dated September 4, 2012. The Vendor Group has also granted the Payee a first right of refusal on any new or existing royalty or stream interests from the Golden Meadows Property. The royalty interest will be registered against title and the payment thereof will be secured by a mortgage registered against the Golden Meadows Property.

In conjunction with the Agreement, Midas Gold has entered into the Sub-Agreement with Franco-Nevada, whereby Franco-Nevada has, for the sum of US$0.35 million, subscribed for two million warrants that are exercisable into shares of Midas Gold at an exercise price of $1.23 per share for a period of ten years from the date of issuance. Midas Gold may force exercise of the warrants if the price of the shares of Midas Gold exceeds $3.23 for a period of thirty consecutive trading days. Completion of both transactions is subject to, among other things, acceptance by the Toronto Stock Exchange in respect of the issuance of the warrants and satisfaction of certain closing conditions.

The transactions are expected to close on or about May 9, 2013.

Advisors
Haywood Securities Inc. acted as financial advisor to Midas Gold and its board of directors in respect of this transaction.

About Midas Gold and the Stibnite-Yellow Pine Project
Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries including Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of deposits in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates are detailed in a technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated effective August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) and filed on SEDAR on September 21, 2012 is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding the completion of the proposed transactions involving Franco-Nevada and its subsidiary and the expected timing thereof that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on Midas Gold’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof; and the assumption that any necessary regulatory approvals and all conditions precedent to the proposed transactions will be obtained and/or satisfied in a timely manner. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “suggest”, “optimize”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “anomalous” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licenses and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

MIDAS GOLD UPDATES PROGRESS AT GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT, IDAHO

Drill Hole MGI-12-349 intersects 84.3m grading 2.39g/t Au, 2.4g/t Ag & 0.09% Sb at Hangar Flats
Hole MGI-13-352 intersects 22.9m @ 3.15g/t Au, 5.7g/t Ag & 0.49% Sb at Yellow Pine
Hole MGI-13-354 intersects 54.9m @ 2.06g/t Au, 2.2g/t Ag at Yellow Pine

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (TSX:MAX), today provided an update on resource estimation and project development activities, as well as recent drill results, on its Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow Pine Mining District, Valley County, Idaho.

Resource Estimates
Since completion of drilling used in the resource estimates for the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”, reported on September 4, 2012), Midas has completed approximately 35,058m of core and reverse circulation drilling in 2012 and early 2013 in connection with an updated resource estimate. This includes 90 holes totalling 20,892m at Yellow Pine, 28 holes totalling 7,367m at West End and 25 holes totalling 6,799m at Hangar Flats that were designed as step-out, in-fill, resource confirmation and resource conversion holes, as well as to provide additional geologic information. The extensive use of oriented core drilling methods and associated structural analysis has provided significant additional detailed, three-dimensional controls on mineralization and structures, establishing better structural and lithologic controls on mineralization, which is helping define more refined domains for resource modeling. As a result of preliminary analysis in late 2012, some additional holes were completed in the first quarter of 2013 to confirm and refine existing geologic interpretations, somewhat delaying completion of resource estimates, but which should result in significantly more robust geologic and resource models as compared to that used in the PEA.

In addition to information from the new drilling discussed above, Midas has recently recovered a quantity of historic drilling related files from the Idaho Geological Survey archives, including additional information on gold, silver, antimony and tungsten mineralization reported by past operators that was previously unavailable for inclusion in past resource estimates and may be utilized in the updated resource estimates, subject to review and validation by Midas Gold’s internal and external Qualified Persons.

An updated resource estimate for the Yellow Pine deposit is currently well advanced. Although originally scheduled for completion at the end of first quarter of 2013, the estimate is now expected to be completed by mid-second quarter 2013, with the other deposits to be completed during the balance of the second quarter. This additional time will facilitate the inclusion of the new structural, geologic and analytical data into our resource estimates, where warranted, ensuring a more robust estimate.

Recent Drill Results
The current program of work, completed since the cut-off date used in the PEA, includes more than 42,532m of core, sonic, reverse circulation, geotechnical and water well drilling completed with the primary objectives of expanding and upgrading the confidence of the existing mineral resources, evaluating geotechnical characteristics of the deposits, collection of metallurgical samples and establishing a groundwater monitoring network. Since the end of the 2012 program, eleven core holes totalling approximately 2,663m and nine monitoring wells totalling approximately 608m have been completed.

Results from the 2013 drilling, primarily focused on confirming and refining the interpretation of portions of the Yellow Pine and Hangar Flats deposits, continues to demonstrate good continuity of grade and thicknesses of gold, silver and antimony mineralization as highlighted in Table 1 below and detailed in Table 2 attached hereto.

In addition, a recent condemnation drill hole (MGI-13-357), completed at a potential plant site proposed in the PEA, intersected deep, but significant precious metals and weak antimony mineralization associated with a large ground geophysical anomaly from our 2010 surveys and an airborne geophysical anomaly from our 2011 airborne geophysical survey. Anomalous levels of gold, antimony and pathfinder trace elements occur in stream sediments and seeps nearby, suggesting the possible presence of a larger target beneath the veneer of glacial outwash covering a potential plant site described in the PEA. Further evaluation of this geophysical feature and follow-up on this drill intercept is planned.

TABLE 1: Highlights of 2013 Drilling

HOLE NUMBER	LOCATION	TOTAL DEPTH (m)	FROM (m)	TO (m)	WIDTH (m)1	Au (g/t)	Ag (g/t)	Sb (%)
MGI-12-349	Hangar Flats	258.2	173.9	258.2	84.3	2.39	2.4	0.091
MGI-13-352	Yellow Pine	188.4	23.8	46.6	22.9	3.15	5.7	0.493
MGI-13-354	Yellow Pine	193.9	61.9	116.7	54.9	2.06	2.2	0.004
MGI-13-357	Plant Site2	384.1	342.3	362.9	20.6	1.21	0.1	0.005

1 Based upon the current 3D interpretation of the Hangar Flats and Yellow Pine deposits, the intervals quoted here are estimated to be at or near true thickness and are composited using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off and may include short intervals of internal waste below the cut-off grade.
2 True thickness unknown

Project Outlook
The Golden Meadows Project design continues to progress beyond the PEA phase, with a focus on trade-off studies to evaluate alternate process flow-sheets, optimal project scale, facilities locations, access and power options and related capital and operating cost estimates, and staging of the project development to optimize the overall project economics and permitability. In addition, extensive post-PEA metallurgical testing is well advanced, and is focused on refining and optimizing the excellent results outlined in the PEA, including increasing grind size, enhancing gold, silver and antimony recoveries, the possibility for tungsten recovery and other opportunities for enhanced outcomes. The results of the updated mineral resource estimates, trade-off studies and additional metallurgical testing will be evaluated in an updated technical report, scheduled for completion in the second half of 2013. In parallel with these activities, environmental baseline data collection and monitoring continues across the project area.

Illustrations
To view the locations of current drill holes, please click here.

Sampling Procedures and Quality Assurance
The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The exploration activities at Golden Meadows were carried out under the supervision of Richard Moses, C.P.G., Qualified Person and Field Operations Manager for the Golden Meadows Project. All gold assays are by a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by an atomic absorption finish (with a 0.002g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 6g/t are re-analyzed using a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. All composites utilize a 0.5g/t cut off and may include internal waste. Silver is analyzed via a 4-acid digestion followed by an ICP finish (with a 1.0g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 10g/t Ag are reanalyzed using a 50g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. Some intervals may not add or subtract correctly due to rounding, but are deemed insignificant. Analyses are carried out by ALS CHEMEX in their Reno and Winnemucca, Nevada and Vancouver, British Columbia laboratories. Umpire samples are routinely submitted to third party labs and blank and standard samples are used for quality assurance and quality control and a review of the results of analyses of the blanks, standards and duplicates by the Company’s Qualified Person indicates values are within normal and acceptable ranges.

About Midas Gold and the Stibnite-Yellow Pine Project
Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries including Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of deposits in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “suggest”, “optimize”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “anomalous” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licenses and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

TABLE 2
(To accompany Midas Gold Corp. news release dated April 15, 2013)

HOLE NUMBER	LOCATION	HOLE TYPE	AZIMUTH	INCLINATION	TOTAL DEPTH (m)	FROM (m)	TO (m)	WIDTH (m)1	Au (g/t)	Ag (g/t)	Sb (%)	W (%)
MGI-12-349	Hangar Flats	Core	-55	90	258.2	97.7	138.2	40.5	1.77	40.2	2.029	0.003
Including						99.7	114.5	14.8	3.33	107.0	5.536	0.002
And						173.9	258.2	84.3	2.39	2.4	0.091	0.003
Including						226.6	256.0	29.4	3.89	3.1	0.034	0.004
MGI-13-350	Hangar Flats	Core	-70	270	401.4				No significant results
MGI-13-351	Yellow Pine	Core	-55	120	228.7				No significant results
MGI-13-352	Yellow Pine	Core	-90	0	188.4	23.8	46.6	22.9	3.15	5.7	0.493	0.004
And						71.8	87.8	16.0	1.88	3.5	0.004	0.001
MGI-13-353	Yellow Pine	Core	-90	0	142.3				No significant results
MGI-13-354	Yellow Pine	Core	-65	144	193.9	61.9	116.7	54.9	2.06	2.2	0.004	0.002
Including						91.6	114.5	22.9	3.12	1.4	0.003	0.001
MGI-13-355	Yellow Pine	Core	-90	0	168.4	10.1	21.5	11.4	1.09	2.1	0.004	0.003
And						28.4	39.8	11.4	3.70	2.3	0.006	0.005
Including						46.6	58.1	11.4	3.58	1.9	0.005	0.003
And						46.6	87.8	41.2	1.80	1.1	0.003	0.002
MGI-13-356	Yellow Pine	Core	-80	162	264.3	184.4	211.8	27.4	1.64	0.9	0.002	0.001
MGI-13-3572	Plant Site2	Core	140	-45	384.1	342.3	362.9	20.6	1.21	0.1	0.005	0.002
MGI-13-3581	Yellow Pine	Core	-44	120	266.7	59.4	81.7	22.3	1.50	2.0	0.007	0.004

1 Assays not received for bottom portion of hole
2 True thickness unknown

MIDAS GOLD TO PRESENT AT BMO GLOBAL METALS AND MINING CONFERENCE AND PDAC 2013

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) is pleased to announce that it is participating in the BMO Global Metals and Mining Conference this week, one of the leading industry events of the year. Stephen Quin, President and CEO of the Company will be presenting at the conference at 12:00PM ET on Wednesday, February 27th, providing an update of Midas Gold’s activities at its world class Golden Meadows gold-antimony project in Idaho.

A webcast of the presentation will be available by clicking here and a copy of the presentation as well as a link to the webcast will be available on our website.

Midas Gold will also be attending Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada convention in Toronto during the week of March 2nd, 2013. The PDAC convention is the world’s primary mineral exploration conference. The Company will have a booth (#2624) at the conference on Tuesday, March 5th and Wednesday, March 6th. Stephen Quin will be presenting on Monday, March 4th at 3:00PM ET at the “Gold in the Americas” session in Room 801A of the Convention Centre.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

MIDAS GOLD REPORTS FINAL RESULTS FROM ITS 2012 DRILLING ON THE SCOUT PROSPECT, GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT

Hole MGI-12-345 intersects 16.2m of 1.68g/t Au, 48.0g/t Ag & 5.42% Sb
Hole MGI-12-347 intersects 8.1m of 3.06g/t Au, 57.8g/t Ag & 6.13% Sb

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) announced today the final results from the Company’s 14-hole, 3,758m, 2012 drilling program at the Scout Prospect on its Golden Meadows property in Idaho, which outlined significant gold and antimony mineralization over a strike length of 825m, to a depth of up to 200m and ranging between 8m and 70m in thickness.

“Our widely spaced exploration drilling along the newly defined Scout trend has demonstrated the presence of a large, strongly mineralized, disseminated, sediment-hosted, gold-silver-antimony system over a significant strike length, thickness and depth,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “Drilling has encountered numerous narrower, but high grade, antimony-silver mineralized zones, similar to those reported herein, associated with through-going structural zones (possibly feeder structures) cross-cutting the more broadly disseminated gold-silver-antimony mineralization,” he said. Continued evaluation of the Scout prospect is in progress, including collection of core samples for metallurgical evaluation and preliminary resources estimation. “Scout is just the first of a number of the 20-plus exploration prospects which offer the potential for the discovery of new, high margin deposits beyond the three currently hosting the large mineral resource at Golden Meadows,” he said.

Highlights of the assay results from the most recent holes are summarized in Table 1 below and full results are listed in Table 2 at the end of this news release. Previous 2011 and 2012 assay results from Scout, as reported in other news releases, can be found on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com.

Table 1: Highlights of Significant Drill Results from Scout Core Drilling

Hole ID	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)	AuEq (g/t)1
MGI-12-321	182.0	209.6	27.6	1.77	2.2	0.050	1.92
MGI-12-328	95.9	115.2	19.4	0.44	0.6	0.313	1.36
MGI-12-345	232.9	249.0	16.2	1.68	48.0	5.418	17. 60
	287.7	292.0	4.3	1.10	2.7	0.480	2.51
MGI-12-347	168.6	183.8	15.2	0.36	10.2	0.425	1.61
	235.2	243.2	8.1	3.06	57.8	6.125	21.06

(1) Gold equivalent grades are reported for illustrative purposes only to show the importance of antimony as a potential by-product in these intercepts. These are in situ values based on assays and utilize $1,400/oz Au and $6.00/lb Sb, the metal prices used in the PEA reported September 4, 2011. The reported gold equivalent values do not account for metallurgical recoveries and payabilities for the different products. After the application of such factors, the contribution of antimony and silver would likely be reduced relative to gold, reducing the gold equivalent grade. However, metallurgical testing has not been completed on the Scout deposit and so the potential impacts of these factors cannot be estimated and, as a result, actual outcomes might vary significantly from those reported herein. The gold equivalent value does not include other potential by-products such as silver or tungsten. The London Metal Bulletin (LMB) Rotterdam average monthly metal price per metric tonne CIF USA for antimony during 2012 was $12,963/tonne ($5.88/lb).

Scout Prospect Description & History

The Scout prospect is situated approximately 1.25 km northeast of the Hangar Flats deposit and has been traced approximately 825m along strike in widely spaced drill holes along a north-south fault system that hosts widespread gold-silver-antimony mineralization. The fault system, all of which may not be mineralized, can be inferred to extend for several km to the north-northwest of the currently drilled area and at least several hundreds of metres to the south-southeast, based on Midas Gold’s 2010 IP-Resistivity Surveys, 2011 airborne magnetics and EM surveys and 2012 CSAMT ground geophysical surveys. This fault system lies approximately 1km to the east of, and parallel to, the Meadow Creek fault system (which controls the Hangar Flats and Yellow Pine gold-silver-antimony-tungsten deposits).

The Scout prospect was first discovered in the 1940s and, between 1948 and 1990, three companies explored the Scout area with 20 short drill holes, totaling approximately 2,435m. Six east-west IP geophysical lines (by past operators and Midas Gold) have been run across the Scout Prospect area and delineate a large resistivity low and IP chargeability anomaly that could be indicative of a larger sulphide mineralized system. In 2012, Midas Gold completed a series of CSAMT survey lines across the prospect outlining an anomaly that suggests the structural zone hosting mineralization may extend further to the south-southeast.

Midas Gold completed 829m in 3 RC holes in the late winter of 2011 testing geophysical anomalies west of and peripheral to the main Scout prospect, with only marginal results. However, in late 2012 (as previously reported in news release 2012-10), 2 RC holes (totaling 485m) testing geophysical anomalies discovered significant gold-silver-antimony mineralization in a covered area in the main Scout prospect area. During 2012, 12 widely spaced core holes (totaling 3,273m) were completed following up on the initial intercepts, with typical drill step-outs along strike approximately 75-100m apart. Mineralization occurs as a series of stacked, tabular lenses of north-striking and west dipping, and east-northeast-striking and north-northwest-dipping shears, sheeted fracture zones and stockwork veins that host gold-silver-antimony mineralization. Combined with results from the historic drilling, the Midas Gold drilling indicates the mineralized zone varies from an average aggregate true width ranging from 8m at the margins to over 75m in the centre and the mineralized area can be traced along strike at least 825m and down dip at least 200m. Mineralization is open to the north, south, down-dip and (to a limited extent) up-dip. Several of the holes drilled by Midas ended in mineralization.

Illustrations
To view the locations of current drill holes, please click here.

Sampling Procedures and Quality Assurance

The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The exploration activities at Golden Meadows were carried out under the supervision of Richard Moses, C.P.G., Qualified Person and Site Operations Manager for the Golden Meadows Project.

All gold assays are by a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by an atomic absorption finish (with a 0.002g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 6g/t are re-analyzed using a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. All composites utilize a 0.3g/t cut off and may include internal waste. Silver is analyzed via a 4-acid digestion followed by an ICP finish (with a 1.0g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 10g/t Ag are reanalyzed using a 50g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. Some intervals may not add or subtract correctly due to rounding, but are deemed insignificant. Analyses are carried out by ALS CHEMEX in their Reno and Winnemucca, Nevada and Vancouver, British Columbia laboratories. Umpire samples are routinely submitted to third party labs and blank and standard samples are used for quality assurance and quality control and a review of the results of analyses of the blanks, standards and duplicates by the Company’s Qualified Person indicates values are within normal and acceptable ranges.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “anomalous” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table 2: Complete Drill Results from Scout

Click to Enlarge

(1) Partial results previously released
(2) Gold equivalent grades are reported for illustrative purposes only to show the importance of antimony as a potential by-product in these intercepts. These are in situ values based on assays and utilize $1,400/oz Au and $6.00/lb Sb, the metal prices used in the PEA reported September 4, 2011. The reported values do not account for metallurgical recoveries and payabilities for the different products. After application of such factors, the contribution of antimony and silver would likely be reduced relative to gold, reducing the gold equivalent grade. However, metallurgical testing has not been completed on the Scout deposit and so the potential impacts of these factors cannot be estimated and, as a result, actual outcomes might vary significantly from those reported herein. The value does not include other potential by-products such as silver or tungsten. The London Metal Bulletin (LMB) Rotterdam average monthly metal price per metric tonne CIF USA for antimony during 2012 was $12,963/tonne ($5.88/lb).

MIDAS GOLD MAKES SENIOR MANAGEMENT APPOINTMENTS TO ADVANCE ITS GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT, IDAHO

2013 Work Program About to Commence, Exploration Permit Progress Updated

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced that, effective January 1, 2013, the Company’s board of directors has made several key management appointments related to its Golden Meadows Project in Idaho: Bob Barnes to the position of Chief Operating Officer, John Meyer to the position of Vice-President, Development and Rocky Chase to the position of Manager of Regulatory Affairs. These appointments reflect the changing roles of Mr. Barnes, Mr. Meyer and Mr. Chase as the Golden Meadows Project advances from resource definition through design optimization, technical studies and, if supported by those studies, into the potential permitting of a mining operation.

“Appointing Bob Barnes to the position of COO, John Meyer as VP Development and Rocky Chase as Manager of Regulatory Affairs reflects their increasing responsibilities and enables the Company to further capitalize on the wealth of expertise and experience that these gentlemen continue to bring to the Midas Gold team and the advancement of the Golden Meadows Project,” said Stephen Quin, President & CEO. “Bob’s experience in operations, permitting and mine development, John’s in project engineering and development, and Rocky’s in mine closure and reclamation are a tremendous asset to the Company in ensuring that we have a sound, well-designed and practical project as we advance our studies and once we enter the permitting process.”

Bob Barnes

Prior to joining Midas Gold as the Company’s VP Development in September 2011, Mr. Barnes was Vice President, Operations with Capstone Mining Corp. and was responsible for Capstone’s mines in Yukon and Mexico (from 2008 through early 2011) and for the development and operation of Capstone’s Cozamin mine in Mexico before the Capstone - Sherwood Copper Corp. merger in 2008. Prior to joining Capstone, Mr. Barnes was involved in technical studies and operations in various locations, including a period with Pan American Silver. From 1985 to 1995, he worked with Wharf Resources, where he was General Manager of the Golden Reward and Wharf gold mines in South Dakota from 1988-1995. From 1981-88, Mr. Barnes played a leadership role in the feasibility, permitting, construction and operation of the original Wharf mine and, subsequently, for the permitting and implementation of a five-fold increase in production at these mines. Mr. Barnes is a mining engineer by training and spent his first ten years with Anaconda and Teck in operations, before moving on to his Wharf-related activities. Mr. Barnes graduated from Montana College of Mineral Science and Technology with a BSc (with honors) in Mining Engineering in 1970 and completed a night school study MBA from the University of South Dakota graduating in 1994. Mr. Barnes has been a Professional Engineer (PEng.) registered in the Province of British Columbia since 1976. In his new role, Mr. Barnes will assume direct responsibility for activities at the Golden Meadows site, for oversight of the project design team and for preparation of the project plan of operations and EIS, once Midas decides to proceed with permit applications.

John Meyer

John Meyer was appointed Development Manager of the Golden Meadows Project in January 2012 and has been managing the design and field operations teams associated with the Golden Meadows Project. Going forward, Mr. Meyer will be focused on the design and engineering aspects of the Golden Meadows Project, and will work closely with the team preparing the plan of operations. Prior to joining Midas Gold, Mr. Meyer was Project Manager of the Kinross Gold Corporation (Kinross) Fruta del Norte (FDN) project located in southeastern Ecuador. Mr. Meyer joined the FDN team in 2007, prior to the merger between Aurelian Resources Inc. (Aurelian) and Kinross, and he played a key role during the merger. His key responsibilities with FDN included managing the scoping, prefeasibility and feasibility level design studies associated with this high-grade epithermal gold and silver deposit; he also managed the field operations team. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Meyer held a corporate position with Barrick Gold Corporation as the Manager of Geotechnical Engineering, based in Salt Lake City, Utah. In this role, Mr. Meyer’s primary focus was to manage the tailings storage facility designs for new projects and operations, audit existing tailings facilities, and assist with mine closure planning, worldwide. Mr. Meyer was an engineering consultant with Klohn Crippen Consultants Ltd. in Calgary, Alberta prior to joining Barrick. Mr. Meyer received a Bachelor of Science Degree (Geophysics) in 1991 and a Bachelor of Engineering Science Degree in 1992 from the University of Western Ontario, and is a member of The Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta.

Rocky Chase

Rocky Chase was appointed Manager of Regulatory Affairs for the Golden Meadows Project in January 2013 and manages the environmental, permitting, and regulatory aspects of the Golden Meadows Project. Previously, Mr. Chase was the Manager of Engineering for the Golden Meadows project and joined Midas Gold in September, 2012.

Prior to joining Midas Gold, Mr. Chase was the North American Manager of Closure Properties for Barrick Gold of North America, based in Salt Lake City, Utah. In this role Mr. Chase’s primary focus was the technical and direct management of numerous mines undergoing various stages of reclamation and closure within the Barrick organization throughout the US and Canada. Mr. Chase joined Barrick Gold in 1996, as the Environmental Manager of the Bullfrog Mine in southern Nevada, where he had direct management responsibility for all environmental and permitting aspects of the operating gold mine. Subsequently, Mr. Chase held the position of Chief Environmental Engineer at Barrick’s Goldstrike Mine, located in northern Nevada, where he supported direct mine site environmental operations, permitting, and various closure projects, as well as technical support for other Barrick projects in the US and Africa.

Mr. Chase began his mining career in the mid 1980’s in the Idaho mining industry working at Thunder Mountain for Coeur d’Alene Mines and at Stibnite for Hecla Mining Company. Additionally he worked at the Grouse Creek project in Idaho during the exploration phase for Hecla Mining Company.

Mr. Chase grew up in southern Idaho, attended Boise State University while working in the Idaho mining industry and later received a Bachelor of Science Degree in Geological Engineering in 1994 from the University of Idaho.

Commencement of 2013 Exploration Program at Golden Meadows

The Company is currently gearing up to commence its 2013 work program at the Golden Meadows Project in Idaho in mid-January. The principal objectives of the 2013 work program are to: (a) complete updated mineral resource updates incorporating the approximately 50,000m of drilling completed in 2012, including a first time estimate for the Scout deposit; (b) to continue infill and step-out drilling around the known deposits as required to more fully define the mineral resources; (c) subject to required permits (see below), to commence the evaluation of a number of high quality exploration prospects for their potential to host additional, higher grade mineral resources; (d) continue to conduct engineering, metallurgical and other work in support of an updated and optimized preliminary economic assessment due for completion in the second half of 2013, incorporating the updated mineral resource estimates; and (e) to continue to collect environmental and other baseline information in support of potential permit applications. Drilling is planned to recommence in mid-January with two core rigs targeting continued resource definition, as well as engineering data collection.

“The 2013 work program reflects a transition year for Midas Gold, as resource confirmation and definition drilling is completed and leads into project design optimization and potential permitting of a mining operation,” said Mr. Quin. “In addition, exploration for completely new deposits, focused on higher grade, higher margin ounces is planned to ramp up in the second half of the year.”

2013-15 Exploration Permitting Update

Following the appeal against the recent US Forest Service (“USFS”) decision to allow certain future drilling activities on public lands within the Golden Meadows Project area, the USFS has withdrawn its decision in order to incorporate additional analysis into its decision. The USFS determined that the activities proposed by Midas Gold for its 2013-15 exploration program are consistent with agency policy and the forest management plan, but that additional supporting information about drilling methods being used is needed to verify the conclusions in its analysis. Midas uses industry-standard closed well drilling system for its ongoing drilling activities and will provide the USFS with any required additional information to support its analysis.

“We agree with the decision of the USFS to ensure that required information supports the decisions reached. Appeals of process and the related agency reviews of the basis for their decisions are a normal part of the permit approval process,” said Mr. Quin. “The additional information will ensure that the project record is robust and that all interested parties can be satisfied that Midas Gold will continue to follow appropriate standards for its activities at Golden Meadows.”

It should be noted that this decision does not affect drilling on Midas Gold’s patented claims, which cover the substantial majority of the mineral resources at Golden Meadows, nor previously permitted drilling activities on public lands. The principal purpose of the 2013-15 permitting process is to conduct exploration of a number of exploration prospects outside of the three main deposits, which drilling is not scheduled to commence until the second half of 2013. Deposit-related and already permitted engineering-related drilling on private and public lands will commence as scheduled in mid-January.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc., and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Yellow Pine is a significant past producer of gold, silver, antimony and tungsten from the 1930s through the mid-1950s. The Homestake deposit located at the northeast end of the Yellow Pine deposit and was operated by Hecla Mining Company from 1987 through 1989. The area between Yellow Pine and Homestake, known as the Clark Tunnel prospect, was the site of early 1930’s and 1940’s era exploration, but no mining has occurred and it has seen only minimal modern exploration drilling. The Hangar Flats deposit was the site of historic underground mining from the 1920’s to the late 1930’s. The West End deposit was the site of open pit mining with heap leach recovery of gold from the 1970s to the late 1990s.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms; the exchange rates for the U.S. and Canadian currencies in 2012 will be consistent with the Corporation’s expectations; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; outcomes of appeals of regulatory decisions; litigation; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

MIDAS GOLD COMPLETES 50KM OF DRILLING AT ITS GOLDEN MEADOWS GOLD-ANTIMONY PROJECT, IDAHO

Hole MGI-12-331 intersects 25.8m of 3.65 g/t Au at Hangar Flats
Hole MGI-12-337 intersects 17.8m grading 3.20 g/t Au, 23.5g/t Ag and 1.54% Sb at Yellow Pine

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced that it has completed the 2012 work program at its 100% owned Golden Meadows gold-antimony project located in Idaho. This work program included more than 50km of core, sonic, reverse circulation (“RC”), geotechnical and water well drilling completed with the objectives of upgrading the confidence of the existing mineral resource, expanding those mineral resources, testing the geotechnical characteristics of the wall rocks and completing water wells for groundwater monitoring purposes. This information will be utilized in the preparation of updated mineral resource estimates as well as optimizing the Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”), the results of which were reported on September 4, 2012.

Significant achievements in 2012 include the following:

Completion of 50,546m of core, sonic, RC, geotechnical and water well drilling in 235 holes, of which 41,429m was core drilling in 162 holes, 7,360m was RC in 29 holes, 481m of sonic drilling to pre-collar other holes and 1,276m was completed in 44 water wells. This is more than double the number of metres and holes completed in 2011, and this drilling is expected to result in an improved mineral resource that will be reported in the first half of 2013.

Approximately 40,000m of resource drilling was designed to upgrade the confidence level in the inferred mineral resources in all three of the known deposits (Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine) or to expand those deposits. Results generally confirmed the previously defined mineral resources and, as a result, are expected to upgrade a significant portion of the mineral resources to an indicated category. In addition, step-out drilling expanded the deposits beyond the previously defined resource limits - especially at Yellow Pine and West End.

Approximately 5,300m of drilling was conducted for the purposes of discovering completely new deposits, which drilling was primarily centred on the newly defined Scout gold-antimony deposit.

Approximately 700m of holes were drilled specifically to collect sample material for metallurgical testing which, along with sample material collected from other holes, is being utilized in an extensive metallurgical optimization program currently underway at independent laboratories.

In addition to drilling, Midas Gold conducted extensive geophysical, geochemical and geological exploration programs (including more than 52km of CSAMT surveys, 3,400 soil samples and 350 stream sediment samples) with the objective of discovering new deposits, and successfully outlined a number of new targets.

In parallel with its exploration and resource definition drilling programs, Midas Gold had significant programs to collect environmental baseline, geotechnical, water quality, groundwater hydrology, and other information to support its plans for an updated Preliminary Economic Assessment scheduled for completion in the second half of 2013.

During 2012, Midas Gold completed extensive remediation of its own disturbance, as well as legacy disturbance left by prior operators, including planting of 8,245 trees, application of dust suppression products to 6.5 miles of private and public roads and reclamation of 18.5 acres.

Midas Gold completed its activities in an environmentally responsible and safe manner, often exceeding local, state and federal regulatory requirements.

Aside from the above milestones, Midas completed a positive PEA, the results of which were announced on September 4, 2012, which outlined the potential for the development of a significant, low-cost, large-scale gold mining operation with important antimony by-products, subject to the acquisition of additional information such as that collected during 2012 and planned for 2013 and, of course, all necessary regulatory approvals. The PEA also outlined the basis for the concurrent reclamation of the extensive legacy environmental disturbance resulting from more than 100 years of mining activity, including the remediation of the site supporting the re-establishment of fish migration past the former Yellow Pine pit.

The Golden Meadows Project design continues to progress beyond the PEA phase, with particular focus on assessing alternate process flow-sheets, alternate project throughputs and related capital costs, and staging of the development to optimize the overall project economics and permitability. These alternates will be considered in the updated PEA, scheduled for the second half of 2012

New Drill Results

Significant previously unreported assay results from the most recent drill holes are summarized in Table 1, below, with more detailed results in Table 2 at the end of this release. Additional results from the ongoing program will be released when assays are received and validated.

Table 1: Highlights of Recent Drill Results from Yellow Pine & West End Deposits

Hole-ID	Hole Type	Area	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)(1)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)
MGI-12-325(1)	Core	Yellow Pine	123.9	171.6	47.7	1.48	2.6	0.004
MGI-12-331	Core	Hangar Flats	101.8	127.6	25.8	3.65	2.6	0.007
MGI-12-335	Core	Yellow Pine	8.9	26.8	17.9	3.07	0.4	0.244
And			98.8	180.1	81.4	1.03	0.6	0.002
Including			158.5	172.2	13.7	2.18	0.8	0.003
MGI-12-337	Core	Yellow Pine	91.4	109.3	17.8	3.20	23.5	1.540
MGI-12-339	Core	Yellow Pine	57.0	81.2	24.2	2.61	15.2	0.905
Including			57.0	69.7	12.7	3.67	21.5	1.271

(1) Based upon the current 3D interpretation of the Hangar Flats and Yellow Pine deposits, the intervals quoted here are at or near true thickness and are composited using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off and may include short intervals of internal waste below the cut-off grade. Intervals denoted (1) are likely to have true widths less than the interval reported herein.

“The completion of the 2012 work program marks a significant milestone in evaluating the economic potential of the Golden Meadows Project,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “With this information in hand, Midas Gold will be able to update its mineral resource estimates, complete an updated preliminary economic assessment and evaluate opportunities to optimize the project design, throughput and potential. Midas Gold is also committed to working with local communities, regulators, governments, tribal entities and other stakeholders to ensure its activities result in a significantly enhanced environmental legacy, while providing potential for significant employment, contracts and taxes to the local community, the State of Idaho and the United States.”

2012 Drill Program

Midas has completed over 50,000m of core, sonic and RC drilling as part of its 2012 drilling program, and has recently completed work on site for the season.

Recent drilling activities in the Hangar Flats and Yellow Pine deposit were part of Midas Gold’s 2012 resource development drilling program which consists of: (1) in-fill drill holes designed to convert inferred mineral resources to the indicated category, (2) step-out drill holes targeting new areas of gold mineralization adjacent to existing mineral resources and, (3) drill holes for geotechnical, water well and metallurgical purposes.

Yellow Pine

Generally, the in-fill drilling program completed in 2012 has been successful in confirming the presence of inferred mineral resources at Yellow Pine. Some infill drill holes have cut mineralization assaying higher grade than had been predicted but over shorter widths while others are intersecting longer intervals of slightly lower grade material than predicted in the models. In addition, a number of step-out holes have intersected significant mineralization outside the resource limits, especially west of the old Yellow Pine pit and in the northeast portion of the Yellow Pine deposit.

Drill holes completed at the northeastern end of the Homestake area of the Yellow Pine deposit continue to delineate gold mineralization adjacent to the Meadow Creek Fault zone. Drill holes MGI-12-325 and MGI-12-335, intersecting 47.7 m of 1.48 g/t gold and 81.4m of 1.03 g/t gold respectively, generally confirmed modeled mineral resources within the metasedimentary roof-pendant. Drill holes MGI-12-329 and MGI-12-332 were designed to test for gold mineralization occurring outside of the mineral resource boundaries within the fault zone separating the roof pendant and the batholith. These holes, collared north of other holes in this area, did not intersect significant mineralization, nor did some holes testing the deeper portions of the mineralization in the Homestake area.

At the south end of the Yellow Pine deposit, in the Monday Tunnel area, recently completed drill holes have verified the presence of shallow high-grade gold-antimony mineralization previously defined by 1950s historic operators. Holes MGI-12-337 and MGI-12-339, drilled in an easterly direction, intersected high-grade gold-antimony mineralization on the west side of a major structure. MGI-12-343 was drilled from the same pad but in a westerly direction to assess mineralization outside of the mineral resource limits but did not intersect significant mineralization.

Hangar Flats

Recent drill holes at Hangar Flats were designed to test geophysical anomalies on the west side of the Meadow Creek fault zone within conceptual resource-limiting pit shells and as in-fill holes to improve confidence in modeled mineral resources. To date, drill holes on the western side of the Meadow Creek Fault intersected the geophysically predicted structural zones, but have only intersected short zones of mineralization. Infill hole MGI-12-331, completed on the eastern side of the Meadow Creek Fault Zone, intersected shallow high-grade gold mineralization where only low grade material was predicted in resource models but did not confirm a higher grade zone interpreted at depth. Approximately 15 additional in-fill drill holes are planned for early 2013 in the Hangar Flats deposit with the objective of converting remaining inferred mineralization to the indicated category.

Illustrations

To view the locations of current drill holes, please click here.

Quality Assurance

The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The exploration activities at Golden Meadows were carried out under the supervision of Richard Moses, CPG, Qualified Person and Field Operations Manager for the Golden Meadows Project.

Samples are transported, handled and stored with chain of custody procedures. Core is sawed or split in representative halves with one half submitted to the laboratory for analysis and the second half of the split saved for archival purposes. Typical core samples are 1-2m in length. All gold assays are by a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by an atomic absorption finish (with a 0.002g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 6g/t are re-analyzed using a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. All composites utilize a 0.5g/t cut off and may include internal waste. Silver is analyzed via a 4-acid digestion followed by an ICP finish (with a 1.0g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 10g/t Ag are reanalyzed using a 50g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. Some intervals may not add or subtract correctly due to rounding, but are deemed insignificant. Analyses are carried out by ALS CHEMEX in their Reno and Winnemucca, Nevada and Vancouver, British Columbia laboratories. Umpire samples are routinely submitted to third party labs and blank and standard samples are used for quality assurance and quality control and a review of the results of analyses of the blanks, standards and duplicates by the Company’s Qualified Person indicates values are within normal and acceptable ranges.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc., and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Yellow Pine is a significant past producer of gold, silver, antimony and tungsten from the 1930s through the mid-1950s. The Homestake deposit located at the northeast end of the Yellow Pine deposit and was operated by Hecla Mining Company from 1987 through 1989. The area between Yellow Pine and Homestake, known as the Clark Tunnel prospect, was the site of early 1930’s and 1940’s era exploration, but no mining has occurred and it has seen only minimal modern exploration drilling. The Hangar Flats deposit was the site of historic underground mining from the 1920’s to the late 1930’s.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms; the exchange rates for the U.S. and Canadian currencies in 2012 will be consistent with the Corporation’s expectations; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; outcomes of appeals of regulatory decisions; litigation; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table 2: Assay Results to Accompany Midas Gold Corp. News Release dated December 18, 2012

HOLE-ID	HOLE TYPE	Area	Azimuth	Inclination	Hole Length	FROM (m)	TO (m)	Interval (m) (1)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)	W (%)
MGI-12-325(1)	Core	Yellow Pine	120	-79	173.4	85.0	115.1	30.0	0.61	3.1	0.004	0.001
And						123.9	171.6	47.7	1.48	2.6	0.004	0.003
Including						148.3	169.6	21.3	2.19	1.4	0.003	0.003
MGI-12-331	Core	Hangar Flats	0	-90	275.8	11.3	23.0	11.7	0.86	1.9	0.007	0.005
And						101.8	127.6	25.8	3.65	2.6	0.007	0.003
And						134.4	160.2	25.8	0.94	2.3	0.121	0.004
And						200.3	212.3	12.0	2.30	58.6	0.005	0.071
MGI-12-335	Core	Yellow Pine	120	-65	199.6	8.9	26.8	17.9	3.07	0.4	0.244	0.006
And						98.8	180.1	81.4	1.03	0.6	0.002	0.002
Including						158.5	172.2	13.7	2.18	0.8	0.003	0.002
MGI-12-337	Core	Yellow Pine	120	-60	251.8	91.4	109.3	17.8	3.20	23.5	1.540	0.001
MGI-12-338	Core	Yellow Pine	249	-53	224.6	29.6	58.4	28.8	0.52	0.0	0.004	0.035
And						201.3	215.3	14.0	0.77	2.3	0.003	0.002
MGI-12-339	Core	Yellow Pine	120	-45	221.6	57.0	81.2	24.2	2.61	15.2	0.905	0.004
Including						57.0	69.7	12.7	3.67	21.5	1.271	0.005

(1) Based upon the current 3D interpretation of the Hangar Flats and Yellow Pine deposits, the intervals quoted here are at or near true thickness and are composited using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off and may include short intervals of internal waste below the cut-off grade. Intervals denoted (1) are likely to have true widths less than the interval reported herein.

MIDAS GOLD REPORTS HIGH GRADE RESULTS FROM YELLOW PINE & WEST END DEPOSITS, GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT

Hole MGI-12-307 intersects 49.5m of 5.42 g/t gold including 15.9m of 12.29 g/t gold at Yellow Pine,
Hole MGI-12-310 intersects 37.5m of 2.94 g/t gold at Yellow Pine
Hole MGI-12-309 intersects 61.7m of 1.97 g/t Au at West End

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced assay results from its ongoing infill and step-out core drilling program from the Yellow Pine and West End deposits on its Golden Meadows Project, Idaho. These most recent results both confirm the presence of inferred gold mineralization within the resource-limiting pit shells and document additional high grade gold mineralization outside of previous mineral resource boundaries.

Significant assay results from these most recent drill holes are summarized in Table 1, below, with more detailed results in Table 2 at the end of this release. Additional results from the ongoing program will be released when assays are received and validated.

Table 1: Highlights of Recent Drill Results from Yellow Pine & West End Deposits

Hole-ID	Hole Type	Area	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)
MGI-12-307(1)	Core	Yellow Pine	201.0	250.6	49.5	5.42	2.5
Including			230.7	246.6	15.9	12.29	5.4
MGI-12-309	Core	West End	139.0	200.7	61.7	1.97	3.7
Including			174.7	198.4	23.8	3.19	7.6
MGI-12-310	Core	Yellow Pine	123.9	161.4	37.5	2.94	2.1
Including			141.6	159.4	17.8	5.43	2.9

(1) Based upon the current 3D interpretation of the West End and Yellow Pine deposits, the intervals quoted here are at or near true thickness and are composited using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off and may include short intervals of internal waste below the cut-off grade. Intervals denoted (1) are likely to have true widths less than the interval reported herein.

“This fall’s in-fill and step-out drilling programs at the Yellow Pine and West End deposits continue to improve confidence in our inferred mineral resources and to expand the overall limits to mineralization,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “We are especially pleased with the results of drill hole MGI-12-307 as it demonstrates lateral continuity of a new high-grade zone at the Yellow Pine deposit.”

2012 Drill Program

Midas has completed over 46,000m of core and RC drilling as part of its 2012 drilling program, and currently has three core rigs operating on site after having as many as nine rigs operating over the summer months.

Yellow Pine

Recent drilling activities in the Yellow Pine deposit are part of Midas Gold’s ongoing resource development drilling program which consists of: (1) in-fill drill holes designed to convert inferred mineral resources to the indicated category, (2) step-out drill holes targeting new areas of gold mineralization adjacent to existing mineral resources and, (3) drill holes for geotechnical and metallurgy purposes. Generally, the in-fill drilling program has been successful in confirming the presence of inferred mineral resources at Yellow Pine. Some infill drill holes have cut mineralization assaying higher grade than predicted but over shorter widths while others are intersecting longer intervals of slightly lower grade material than predicted in the models. In addition, a number of step-out holes have intersected significant mineralization outside the resource limits, especially west of the old Yellow Pine pit and in the northeast of Yellow Pine. “Overall, we are pleased with the results of the in-fill and step-out drilling program. Our inferred resources are generally holding together under tighter drill spacing and we anticipate successful conversion of a substantial majority of the mineral resources to the indicated category in preparation for our updated technical study,” said Stephen Quin.

Drill hole MGI-12-307, located at the northern end of the Homestake area of the Yellow Pine deposit, was drilled through the margin of the resource-limiting conceptual pit shell for geotechnical purposes and intersected high-grade gold mineralization over significant widths. The hole was completed north of other new, significant intercepts in this area, including those in holes MGI-12-263 and MGI-12-267, reported previously. Gold mineralization in this area occurs within and adjacent to a structural corridor along the contact between the metasedimentary roof-pendant and igneous rocks of the Idaho batholith. The mineralized zone is characterized by strong silicification and sulphide mineralization and contains short intervals assaying significantly higher grade than the broadly disseminated gold mineralization characteristic of the main body of the Yellow Pine deposit. The zone occurs below the historic property boundary separating land parcels previously controlled by different operators prior to Midas Gold’s consolidation of district mineral rights in 2011. Because of this, the area received minimal historic drill testing. With additional drilling, this new zone may constitute a significant addition to Yellow Pine mineral resources.

West End

Production of oxide heap leach gold ores from the West End pit ceased in the 1990’s, but gold mineralization was documented continuing well below the pit bottom by past exploration and development drilling. Midas Gold initiated drilling in the West End deposit in 2010 and the 2012 drilling campaign was designed to: (1) confirm historic drill data, (2) in-fill and convert inferred resources to indicated and (3) step-out around and below the modeled resource pit bottom.

Drill holes MGI-12-269, MGI-12-295, MGI-12-305 and MGI-12-309, reported herein, were drilled to improve confidence in inferred mineral resources. These holes cut mineralization at significant depth, where predicted, demonstrating the reliability of the West End structural model. Drill holes MGI-11-120 and MGI-11-121, pre-collared in 2011 and completed in 2012as part of Midas Gold’s ongoing geotechnical pit slope stability program, cut mineralization beneath and adjacent to the modeled resource-limiting conceptual pit.

Exploration Permitting

Midas Gold has been advised that the US Forest Service’s record of decision in respect of permitting of certain drilling activities planned for 2013 on US Forest Service land has been appealed. Midas Gold is reviewing the basis of the appeal. In the meantime, drilling activities continue under existing permits on Midas Gold’s private land and US Forest Service land.

Illustrations

To view the locations of current drill holes, please click here.

Quality Assurance

The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The exploration activities at Golden Meadows were carried out under the supervision of Richard Moses, CPG, Qualified Person and Field Operations Manager for the Golden Meadows Project.

Samples are transported, handled and stored with chain of custody procedures. Core is sawed or split in representative halves with one half submitted to the laboratory for analysis and the second half of the split saved for archival purposes. Typical core samples are 1-2m in length. All gold assays are by a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by an atomic absorption finish (with a 0.002g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 6g/t are re-analyzed using a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. All composites utilize a 0.5g/t cut off and may include internal waste. Silver is analyzed via a 4-acid digestion followed by an ICP finish (with a 1.0g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 10g/t Ag are reanalyzed using a 50g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. Some intervals may not add or subtract correctly due to rounding, but are deemed insignificant. Analyses are carried out by ALS CHEMEX in their Reno and Winnemucca, Nevada and Vancouver, British Columbia laboratories. Umpire samples are routinely submitted to third party labs and blank and standard samples are used for quality assurance and quality control and a review of the results of analyses of the blanks, standards and duplicates by the Company’s Qualified Person indicates values are within normal and acceptable ranges.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc., and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Yellow Pine is a significant past producer of gold, silver, antimony and tungsten from the 1930s through the mid-1950s. The Homestake deposit located at the northeast end of the Yellow Pine deposit and was operated by Hecla Mining Company from 1987 through 1989. The area between Yellow Pine and Homestake, known as the Clark Tunnel prospect, was the site of early 1930’s and 1940’s era exploration, but no mining has occurred and it has seen only minimal modern exploration drilling. Historical geologic, ground geophysical and drilling data obtained by Midas suggested the possibility that significant mineralization might be present in this area and recent drill results confirm this potential. The West End deposit was the site of open pit mining with heap leach recovery of gold from the 1970s to the late 1990s.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms; the exchange rates for the U.S. and Canadian currencies in 2012 will be consistent with the Corporation’s expectations; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; outcomes of appeals of regulatory decisions; litigation; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table 2: Assay Results to Accompany Midas Gold Corp. News Release dated November 21, 2012

Hole-ID	Hole Type	Area	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)	Tungsten (%)
MGI-11-120	Core	West End	60.8	97.1	36.3	1.30	1.1	0.01	0.001
MGI-11-121	Core	West End	144.8	172.5	27.7	1.91	11.1	0.01	0.001
Including			159.7	172.5	12.8	2.67	21.6	0.01	0.001
MGI-11-121	Core	West End	232.9	260.6	27.7	1.37	5.4	0.01	0.003
MGI-12-260	RC	West End	61.0	85.3	24.4	1.26	3.3	0.01	0.002
And			144.8	167.6	22.9	0.57	0.4	0.01	0.002
And			173.7	207.3	33.5	1.72	1.3	0.00	0.002
And			216.4	245.4	29.0	0.70	1.4	0.01	0.001
MGI-12-269	RC	West End	118.9	179.8	61.0	1.05	0.8	0.01	0.001
Including			149.4	169.2	19.8	1.50	1.0	0.00	0.002
MGI-12-295	Core	West End	8.5	27.3	18.8	1.32	4.4	0.01	0.003
And			168.4	179.5	11.1	0.67	0.0	0.00	0.001
And			258.3	305.0	46.6	1.03	1.8	0.01	0.002
MGI-12-297(2)	Core	Yellow Pine	48.8	61.0	12.2	3.64	4.0	0.01	0.004
MGI-12-303	Core	West End	149.5	163.4	13.9	0.64	0.8	0.01	0.004
And			202.7	215.5	12.8	3.34	4.1	0.02	0.002
MGI-12-304	Core	Yellow Pine	29.6	42.7	13.1	0.54	0.0	0.00	0.001
MGI-12-305	Core	West End	61.7	100.3	38.6	0.90	1.0	0.00	0.001
And			107.1	119.8	12.7	0.73	1.1	0.02	0.001
And			133.5	144.9	11.4	2.81	2.7	0.01	0.002
And			165.5	194.5	29.0	1.15	0.8	0.01	0.001
MGI-12-307(1)	Core	Yellow Pine	64.6	78.6	14.0	0.85	1.6	0.00	0.000
And			101.0	121.6	20.6	0.63	0.7	0.00	0.001
And			201.0	250.6	49.5	5.42	2.5	0.00	0.002
Including			230.7	246.6	15.9	12.29	5.4	0.01	0.002
MGI-12-309	Core	West End	139.0	200.7	61.7	1.97	3.7	0.01	0.003
Including			174.7	198.4	23.8	3.19	7.6	0.01	0.004
And	Core	West End	214.4	237.3	22.9	1.04	0.6	0.00	0.002
MGI-12-310	Core	Yellow Pine	123.9	161.4	37.5	2.94	2.1	0.04	0.001
Including			141.6	159.4	17.8	5.43	2.9	0.09	0.001
MGI-12-316	Core	West End	51.5	63.4	11.9	0.92	1.4	0.01	0.012
And			112.8	131.1	18.3	0.85	0.9	0.00	0.001
MGI-12-317	Core	Yellow Pine	235.8	254.1	18.3	0.68	1.7	0.05	0.001
MGI-12-318	Core	Yellow Pine	60.4	72.2	11.9	1.06	1.7	0.00	0.001
MGI-12-322	Core	Yellow Pine	35.7	51.8	16.2	2.54	3.3	0.01	0.002

(1) Based upon the current 3D interpretation of the West End and Yellow Pine deposits, the intervals quoted here are at or near true thickness and are composited using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off and may include short intervals of internal waste below the cut-off grade. Intervals denoted (1) are likely to have true widths less than the interval reported herein.
(2) Hole abandoned, terminated in mineralization.

MIDAS GOLD'S 2012 EXPLORATION PROGRAM OUTLINES MULTIPLE TARGETS ON ITS GOLDEN MEADOWS PROPERTY

Several Multi-element, Multi-source Anomalies Defined Extending Known Mineralization & In New Areas

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced that its 2012 geological, geochemical and geophysical programs completed across its Golden Meadows property in Idaho successfully confirmed and extended areas of known or suspected mineralization and outlined several new gold-silver-antimony targets. A number of these target areas exhibit coincident highly anomalous stream, soil and rock multi-element geochemical signatures and are associated with strong airborne electromagnetic (“EM”) and ground geophysical anomalies that show characteristics similar to those associated with the three known deposits. These results suggest potential for the discovery of further significant new gold-silver-antimony deposits at Golden Meadows, as well as extensions to known deposits. Highlights of the 2012 program include:

The 2km long trend between the already defined Hangar Flats and Yellow Pine deposits, which area encompasses three consistently highly anomalous areas in gold, silver and antimony in both stream and soil samples, each with associated Controlled Source Audio-frequency Magnetotelluric (“CSAMT”) and airborne EM anomalies consistent with the adjacent deposits. Limited drilling in this area, such as in the Monday tunnel area, has already intersected high grade sulphide mineralization; these results suggest there could be significant mineral potential in these areas.

The 1km long area extending from the north end of the West End mineral resource to the Sugar prospect, also with coincident multi-element soil, rock and silt anomalies, and associated CSAMT and airborne EM anomalies. This trend is coincident with the fault offset continuation of favourable host rocks that are associated with the majority of the West End mineral resource and suggests this significant mineralized system extends considerably further than has currently been tested by drilling.

The Rabbit prospect, a Midas Gold discovery in 2010 that has developed into an approximately 1km wide zone of coincident soil and silt multi-element anomalies with associated CSAMT and airborne EM anomalies. The results suggest potential for a significant scale but blind mineralized system in the Rabbit area.

The Mule prospect, also a Midas Gold discovery, with significant gold-silver values in soils, coincident multi-gram gold values in rock samples in altered intrusives and a strong airborne EM anomaly.

Expanded previously known trends, such as the Scout-Upper Garnet-Upper Midnight trend and the Garnet-Doris K trend, where soils, CSAMT and airborne EM outline two highly anomalous approximate 1km long trends with known multi-gram assays in rock samples and wide-spaced drill holes.

“Our 2012 geochemical and ground geophysical surveys were designed to identify and delineate potential extensions to known mineral trends and identify completely new mineralized areas,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “The results of our 2012 regional exploration has exceeded our expectations and has generated a target-rich environment, with multiple, large scale, multi-element, multi-survey anomalies that suggest potential for substantial extensions to known mineralized systems as well as outlining some large scale new targets,” he said. “In 2013, we intend to evaluate the potential of the highest priority of these new opportunities through drilling.” Despite the long history of exploration in the district that extends back to the earliest 1900s, most mineralization is blind and the property has not been subject to systematic modern exploration that can detect such mineralization. By way of comparison, the Hangar Flats deposit was discovered based on a single outcrop a few metres across, the Yellow Pine deposit was completely blind and the West End-style sediment-hosted mineralization was unrecognized until the 1970s; each turned into a substantial gold deposit. The recently defined Scout prospect was discovered as a result of geochemical and geophysical surveys detecting a potential blind mineralized system where drilling has subsequently demonstrated significant gold-silver-antimony grades over considerable strike length and thicknesses.

2012 Stream Sediment Sampling Program

Midas Gold staff completed a high density stream silt sampling program to assist in evaluation of anomalies generated from its 2011 airborne geophysical program. The 2012 survey involved collection of 351 silts roughly every 300-500m along all the major drainages within the project area, testing extensive areas previously not sampled and/or newly staked by Midas Gold in 2011 as a result of the airborne geophysical survey. The average catchment area of sampled drainages is roughly 1.0-1.5km2, providing a high degree of localization for the source of the anomalies. The stream sediment survey covers a total area of approximately 110km2 and encompasses most of Midas Gold’s land holdings.

Over 80% of the silt samples reported anomalous gold and pathfinder elements, with a maximum value of 1.78 ppm (1.78 g/t) gold, 1.91 ppm (1.91g/t) silver, 458 ppm antimony, 340 ppm tungsten reported from the silts collected during the 2012 sampling program. The strongest gold and multi-element pathfinder anomalies outside of the known deposits occur in silt samples collected from streams draining from the northern extension of the Hangar Flats trend (toward Yellow Pine), as well as the Garnet, Rabbit, Cinnamid-Ridgetop, Upper Midnight, Doris K and Sugar prospects.

2012 Soil Sediment Sampling Program

Midas Gold staff and contractors established several large soil grids and completed a fill-in soil sampling program designed to assist in the evaluation of airborne geophysical anomalies generated from its 2011 airborne geophysical program. This was done to confirm and further expand on anomalies outlined in various historic datasets from past operators and to expand those anomalies defined during Midas Gold’s soil surveys completed between 2009 and 2011. The soil surveys involved collection of 3,429 B-horizon soil samples covering approximately 25km2 of the Company’s 110 square kilometer property position. These new grids complement data from historic grids that cover another 13 km2 of the project area.

Multi-element pathfinder and gold-in-soil anomalies were outlined in several areas including: (1) anomalies at the Mule prospect, coincident with strong gold-in-rock and airborne geophysical anomalies; (2) at the Sugar Prospect, coincident with airborne EM, aeromagnetics and CSAMT anomalies; and, (3) at various other prospects. Over 80% of the soil samples reported anomalous gold and pathfinder elements with a maximum value of 1.9 ppm (1.9g/t) gold, 6.8 ppm (6.8g/t) silver, 2,580 ppm (0.26%) antimony and 510 ppm tungsten reported from the soils collected during the 2012 sampling program, illustrating the pervasive nature of the mineralization in the areas sampled.

2012 CSAMT Ground Geophysical Survey Program

Geophysical survey crews from Zonge Engineering, a Tucson-based contractor, completed a total of 51.5 line-km of ground geophysical surveys using CSAMT along twelve, east-west oriented, 4.3km long lines. The surveys covered approximately 21km2, with lines spaced 400m apart and stations every 25m along the lines. The survey coverage extends from north of the Yellow Pine deposit south to the DMEA area of the Hangar Flats Deposit. Preliminary results received from the contractor indicate all three of the known deposits covered by the CSAMT surveys show a response and a significant number of new anomalies were generated this year that appear to be of an appropriate size and character to warrant additional follow-up. Additional details of results from the CSAMT survey will be released when the final data is received and integrated with the other exploration datasets.

CSAMT is a low-impact, non-intrusive, commonly-used, surface-based geophysical method which provides resistivity information in the subsurface. The CSAMT method involves transmitting a controlled signal over a range of frequencies into the ground from one location (transmitter site) and measuring the received electric and magnetic fields in the area of interest (receiver site). The measured field magnitudes are used to calculate the apparent resistivity of the area underlying the receiver site. Calculated resistivity values from CSAMT data relate to geology and can be attributed to effects of rock type, porosity, pore fluids, faults and the presence of certain mineral assemblages, and in this case minerals associated with gold mineralization within the district. Areas of low resistivity may be caused by a number of factors, but can often be attributed to areas of mineralization and combined with other data can yield valuable 3-dimensional information on subsurface structures, geology and mineralization prior to drill testing.

Illustrations
To view the locations of geochemical anomalies, please click here.

Sampling Procedures and Quality Assurance

The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The exploration activities at Golden Meadows were carried out under the supervision of Christopher Dail, C.P.G., Qualified Person and Exploration Manager for the Golden Meadows Project.

Stream silt samples were collected in the field from small stream catchments using stainless steel implements and wet sieved in the field to -20 mesh and then later dried and sieved in the laboratory to -80 mesh. Soil samples were collected in the field using stainless steel implements and then later dried and sieved in the laboratory to -80 mesh. Field duplicates were collected every 20th sample for quality control purposes for both silts and soils. Both soils and silt samples were digested with a 4-acid hot leach followed by analysis for gold and 41 trace elements via atomic absorption and mass spectrometry at ALS Chemex laboratories in Reno, Nevada and Vancouver, B.C. using method ME-MS41L. Blank and standard samples are used for quality assurance and quality control and a review of the results of analyses of the blanks, standards and duplicates by the Corporation’s Qualified Person indicates values are within normal and acceptable ranges.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc., and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “anomalous” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

MIDAS GOLD REPORTS RESULTS FROM HIGH GRADE CORE OF YELLOW PINE DEPOSIT, GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT, IDAHO

Hole MGI-12-306 intersects 238m of 2.61g/t Au, and 0.29% Sb; including 61.6m of 3.37g/t Au, and 0.72% Sb

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced further results from its ongoing infill and step-out core drilling program on its Golden Meadows Project, Idaho, including results from definition drilling in the high grade core of the Yellow Pine deposit beneath the former open pit. Historic mining operations ceased in the Yellow Pine pit in 1952, but high grade gold-antimony mineralization was documented as continuing well below the pit bottom in past exploration and development drilling. Hole MGI-12-306 was drilled as part of Midas Gold’s ongoing resource definition and metallurgical sample collection program, as recommended in the recently released Preliminary Economic Analysis (“PEA”). Hole MGI-12-306 was drilled in order to: (a) confirm and upgrade the resource estimates for this area that is conceptually scheduled for early production in the PEA, (b) to provide fresh samples to optimize recovery from higher grade mineralization scheduled for the early years of the conceptual mine plan outlined in the PEA, and (c) to provide additional antimony assay data to support antimony resource estimation for a larger portion of the Yellow Pine deposit. Only 17% of mill feed incorporated into the conceptual mine plan set out in the PEA currently has an antimony estimate associated with it, yet Midas drilling has outlined antimony mineralization well outside the antimony zone used in the PEA in the Yellow Pine deposit. Hole MGI-12-306 was successful in respect of all three objectives; this release also includes additional infill and step-out holes in the Yellow Pine deposit area.

Significant assay results from these most recent drill holes at Yellow Pine are summarized in Table 1, below, with more detailed results in Table 2 at the end of this release. Additional results from the ongoing program will be released when assays are received and validated.

Table 1: Highlights of Recent Drill Results from Yellow Pine

Hole ID	Target Area	Hole Type	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)
MGI-12-306(3)	Yellow Pine	Core	37.2	275.2	238.0	2.61	3.0	0.29
including			200.0	261.5	61.6	3.37	6.0	0.72
including			208.2	221.0	12.8	2.71	12.7	1.58

“We are pleased with the drill results from this year’s drilling at Yellow Pine, where we have expanded the limits of known gold-silver-antimony mineralization, and are now focusing on infill and step-out drilling to better define the high grade mineralization (including the antimony zones) and to convert inferred resources to indicated resources,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “We also plan to continue testing the outer limits of the Yellow Pine system, since recent geophysical studies and 3-dimensional reconstruction of faults suggest there is potential for additional mineralization along the flanks of the Yellow Pine Deposit, where post-mineral faults may have offset mineralization, and we hope to further test these targets in the coming months,” he said.

Metallurgical Program

As part of Midas Gold’s ongoing work program to advance the project post-PEA, a large representative suite of more than 500 metallurgical sample composites was selected from core holes drilled by Midas Gold and will be utilized for flow sheet development and variability testing. On-going flotation testing will be performed by SGS in Vancouver, B.C., in order to further optimize metallurgical performance under the supervision of Blue Coast Metallurgy Ltd., B.C. The PEA incorporated quantitative evaluation of 70 variability composites for gold, antimony and host rock mineralogy by scanning electron microscope (QEMSCAN). Grindability testing and more than 130 flotation test runs have been completed to date, results of which were utilized in the PEA.

As recommended in the PEA, further metallurgical sampling and test work is continuing in order to further optimize and refine the conceptual process plant flow sheet and metallurgical parameters. This additional metallurgical testing is part of a comprehensive project optimization process being undertaken, as recommended in the PEA, to evaluate the potential for:

Optimization of flow sheets and plant sizing, including potential for a 25-50% increase in throughput.

Extending the higher grade production profile for additional time, through extensions to the higher grade known deposits, definition of additional higher grade deposits and/or definition of significantly higher grade/lower tonnage mineralization that could be blended with the lower grade West End tonnage thereby giving an effective higher grade feed to the mill;

Extension of antimony by-product credits to a broader proportion of the mineral resources as the antimony resources are currently limited to approximately 17% of the mill feed utilized in the PEA, primarily due to lack of analytical antimony values in historic drill datasets;

Increasing resources and/or reducing strip ratios by drill testing unclassified material within the conceptual pit limits that is currently treated as waste in the PEA, but is essentially undrilled;

Exploration - both around deposits and throughout district with the objective of defining higher grade mineralization that is economically advantaged relative to the lower margin West End material utilized in the PEA.

2012 Drill Program

Midas has completed over 41,000m of core and RC drilling as part of its 2012 drilling program, and currently has four core rigs operating on site after having as many as nine rigs operating over the summer months.

Illustrations

To view the locations of current drill holes, please click here.

Quality Assurance

The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The exploration activities at Golden Meadows were carried out under the supervision of Richard Moses, CPG, Qualified Person and Site Operations Manager for the Golden Meadows Project.

Samples are transported, handled and stored with chain of custody procedures. Core is sawed or split in representative halves with one half submitted to the laboratory for analysis and the second half of the split saved for archival purposes. Typical core samples are 1-2m in length. All gold assays are by a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by an atomic absorption finish (with a 0.002g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 6g/t are re-analyzed using a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. All composites utilize a 0.5g/t cut off and may include internal waste. Silver is analyzed via a 4-acid digestion followed by an ICP finish (with a 1.0g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 10g/t Ag are reanalyzed using a 50g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. Some intervals may not add or subtract correctly due to rounding, but are deemed insignificant. Analyses are carried out by ALS CHEMEX in their Reno and Winnemucca, Nevada and Vancouver, British Columbia laboratories. Umpire samples are routinely submitted to third party labs and blank and standard samples are used for quality assurance and quality control and a review of the results of analyses of the blanks, standards and duplicates by the Company’s Qualified Person indicates values are within normal and acceptable ranges.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc., and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated August 15, 2012, (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table 2: Assay Results to Accompany Midas Gold Corp. News Release dated October 15, 2012

Hole ID	Target Area	Hole Type	Bearing	Inclination	Total Depth (m)	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)	Tungsten (%)
MGI-12-297(1)	Yellow Pine	Core	177	-20	60.96	48.8	61.0	12.2	3.64	4.0	0.01	0.004
MGI-12-304	Yellow Pine	Core	0	-90	263.35	29.6	42.7	13.1	0.54	0.0	0.00	0.001
MGI-12-306(3)	Yellow Pine	Core	165	-31	291.4	37.2	275.2	238.0	2.61	3.0	0.29	0.005
including						200.0	261.5	61.6	3.37	6.0	0.72	0.003
including						208.2	221.0	12.8	2.71	12.7	1.58	0.002

(1) Hole abandoned prematurely.
(2) Based upon the current 3D interpretation of the Yellow Pine deposits the intervals quoted here are at or near true thickness and are composited using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off and may include short intervals of internal waste below the cut-off grade unless otherwise noted
(3) Intervals denoted (3) are less than true width.

MIDAS GOLD EXPANDS MINERALIZATION AT THE SCOUT PROSPECT, GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT, IDAHO

Hole MGI-12-302 intersects 121.2m of 1.20g/t Au, 0.49% Sb
Hole MGI-12-308 intersects 58.1m of 1.21g/t Au

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced additional assay results from its ongoing core drilling program at its Scout Prospect, on the Golden Meadows Project in Idaho. Step-out drilling continues to intersect significant gold-silver-antimony mineralization and is expanding the area of mineralization beyond previously defined boundaries and suggests potential for a good grade, bulk tonnage mineralizing system with significant antimony credits.

“Our recent drill results from Scout have not only confirmed the presence of high-grade gold-silver-antimony mineralization delineated in widely spaced historic drill holes, but have expanded this mineralization down-dip, up-dip and along-strike, and have shown the mineralization to be much thicker than prior, short drill holes had indicated,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “In addition, ground and airborne geophysical surveys suggest that the mineralized system may extend farther along strike, indicating potential for a bulk tonnage mineralizing system with good gold grades and significant antimony credits,” he said. Additional drilling is in progress and is designed to further define the nature and extent of gold-silver-antimony mineralization at the Scout prospect.

Significant assay results from the most recent holes are summarized in Table 1, below, and full results are listed in Table 2 at the end of this news release. Previous 2011 and 2012 assay results from Scout, as reported in other news releases, can be found on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com. Additional results from the ongoing program will be released when assays are received and validated.

Table 1: Significant Results from Recent Scout Drill Holes

Hole ID	Hole Type	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)
MGI-12-302	Core	85.3	206.5	121.2	1.20	2.0	0.490
including		85.3	100.6	15.2	3.33	1.6	0.173
including		150.9	162.9	12.0	4.55	4.7	1.708
MGI-12-308	Core	171.6	229.7	58.1	1.21	1.4	0.043

The average aggregate true thickness of mineralization at Scout, based on drilling completed to date, is 75m and the mineralized area can be trace along strike at least 450m and down dip at least 200m. Mineralization is open to the north, south, down-dip and (to a limited extent) up-dip, with geophysical surveys and shallow historic drilling suggesting a strike length in excess of 650m. Several of the holes drill by Midas, including the two reported here, ended in mineralization. Overall, drill results received to date, combined with the results of geophysical surveys and historic drilling, suggest potential for a large scale, bulk tonnage gold system with significant antimony and silver credits. Antimony is primarily used as a flame retardant in the manufacture of plastics and other materials, as well as an alloy with lead in batteries. Recent antimony prices have averaged approximately US$5.70 per pound.

2012 Drill Program

Midas has completed over 41,000m of core and reverse circulation drilling as part of its 2012 drilling program, and currently has four core rigs operating on site.

Scout Prospect Description & History

The Scout Ridge prospect is situated approximately 1.25 km northeast of the Hangar Flats deposit, and has been traced approximately 650m along strike in widely spaced drill holes along a north-south fault system that hosts widespread gold-silver-antimony mineralization. This fault system, all of which may not be mineralized, can be inferred to extend for several km to the north-northwest, based on Midas Gold’s 2011 airborne magnetics and EM surveys. Scattered soil anomalies and geologic mapping along this fault shows that it lies approximately 1km to the east of, and parallel to, the Meadow Creek fault system (which controls the Hangar Flats and Yellow Pine gold-silver-antimony-tungsten deposits).

The Scout prospect was first discovered in the 1940s, after U.S. Geological Survey and U.S. Bureau of Mines workers conducted experimental biogeochemical sampling in the district, which outlined a large gold and antimony biogeochemical anomaly. The area that hosts the biogeochemical anomaly occurs in a distinct, linear, north-south trending topographic depression interpreted to be a less resistant structural zone that is marked by strong geophysical anomalies. A series of weak but pronounced soil anomalies occur parallel to this trend, slightly uphill to the east, where the drilled zones would project to the surface (but are covered by talus and slope debris). Several small pits and trenches (that were likely excavated during 1940s during government-sponsored antimony-tungsten exploration) exposed massive, blocky, slightly schistose quartzite containing narrow, gold-bearing, high-grade stibnite veins and altered, sulphide-bearing, igneous dikes. Stratigraphic relationships, derived from outcrop mapping and drill data, indicate the valley itself is underlain by calc-silicates and silicified and dolomitized carbonates, similar to those that hosts the nearby Garnet Prospect. The Garnet prospect lies approximately 0.8km to the east of Scout and was the site of a 1995 open pit mining operation that produced approximately 35,000 ounces of gold from oxidized ores in skarn and calc-silicates grading approximately 6g/t gold. Between 1948 and 1990 three companies explored the Scout area with 20 short drill holes, totaling approximately 2,435m. Six east-west IP geophysical lines (by past operators and Midas Gold) have been run across the Scout Prospect area and delineate a large resistivity low and IP chargeability anomaly that could be indicative of a larger sulphide mineralized system.

Midas has now completed seven holes totaling 1,767.5m at Scout and, combined with results from the historic drilling, indicates the Scout Prospect is underlain by a series of stacked, tabular lenses of north-striking, moderately west-dipping shears, sheeted fracture zones and stockwork veins that host gold-silver-antimony mineralization that can be traced along strike for at least 450m.

Illustrations

To view the locations of current drill holes, please click here.

Quality Assurance

The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The exploration activities at Golden Meadows were carried out under the supervision of Richard Moses, CPG, Qualified Person and Site Operations Manager for the Golden Meadows Project.

Samples are transported, handled and stored with chain of custody procedures. Core is sawed or split in representative halves with one half submitted to the laboratory for analysis and the second half of the split saved for archival purposes. Typical core samples are 1-2m in length. All gold assays are by a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by an atomic absorption finish (with a 0.002g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 6g/t are re-analyzed using a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. All composites utilize a 0.3g/t cut off and may include up to 10 metres of internal waste. Silver is analyzed via a 4-acid digestion followed by an ICP finish (with a 1.0g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 10g/t Ag are re-analyzed using a 50g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. Some intervals may not add or subtract correctly due to rounding, but are deemed insignificant. Analyses are carried out by ALS CHEMEX in their Reno and Winnemucca, Nevada and Vancouver, British Columbia laboratories. Umpire samples are routinely submitted to third party labs and blank and standard samples are used for quality assurance and quality control and a review of the results of analyses of the blanks, standards and duplicates by the Company’s Qualified Person indicates values are within normal and acceptable ranges.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc., and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated August 15, 2012 (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. This Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Hangar Flats is a high-grade gold-silver-antimony-tungsten discovery made in 2009 and these most recent drill intercepts are step-outs to the north from the areas discovered and drilled during the 2009 and 2010 field seasons. Yellow Pine is a significant past producer of gold, silver, antimony and tungsten from the 1930s through the mid-1950s. The Homestake deposit located at the northeast end of the Yellow Pine deposit and was operated by Hecla Mining Company from 1987 through 1989. The area between Yellow Pine and Homestake, known as the Clark Tunnel prospect, was the site of early 1930’s and 1940’s era exploration, but no mining has occurred and it has seen only minimal modern exploration drilling. Historical geologic, ground geophysical and drilling data obtained by Midas suggested the possibility that significant mineralization might be present in this area and recent drill results confirm this potential. The West End deposit was the site of open pit mining with heap leach recovery of gold from the 1970s to the late 1990s. Scout is a 1950’s area prospect located near the old town of Stibnite that was the site of scattered past exploration trenching and limited drilling by past operators. In the winter of 2011 Midas discovered significant gold-antimony mineralization at Scout and has been conducting step-out drilling and geophysical surveys to further define the limits of the mineralized system.

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms; the exchange rates for the U.S. and Canadian currencies in 2012 will be consistent with the Corporation’s expectations; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licenses and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table 2: Recent Drill Results from Scout to Accompany News Release dated October 11, 2012

Hole ID	Hole Type	Bearing	Inclination	Total Depth (m)	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)
MGI-12-302	Core	120	-45	274.0	85.3	206.5	121.2	1.20	2.0	0.490
including					85.3	100.6	15.2	3.33	1.6	0.173
including					150.9	162.9	12.0	4.55	4.7	1.708
And					218.7	237.1	18.4	0.85	0.5	0.019
And					248.4	274.0	25.6	0.36	0.1	0.016
MGI-12-308	Core	90	-55	250.7	29.0	35.4	6.4	0.49	0.0	0.004
And					61.0	80.5	19.5	0.55	0.1	0.002
And					98.8	103.3	4.6	0.66	0.3	0.097
And					126.2	137.6	11.4	0.31	0.7	0.152
And					171.6	229.7	58.1	1.21	1.4	0.043
And					247.5	250.7	3.2	1.26	0.7	0.003

MIDAS GOLD REPORTS SIGNIFICANT RESULTS FROM INFILL & STEP-OUT DRILLING AT ITS GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT, IDAHO

Hole MGI-12-223 intersects 44.8m at 2.26g/t Au, 0.59% Sb at Yellow Pine
Hole MGI-12-281 intersects 95.3m at 2.80g/t Au at Yellow Pine
Hole MGI-12-286 intersects 110.3m at 2.23g/t Au, including 26.7m at 3.97g/t Au, at West End
Hole MGI-12-293 intersects 132.6m at 3.56g/t Au & 0.43% Sb, including 36.9m at 4.92g/t Au & 1.51% Sb, at Yellow Pine

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA – Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced additional assay results from its ongoing core and reverse circulation (“RC”) drilling program on its Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow Pine District, Idaho. Results from Yellow Pine drilling include confirmation holes delineating high-grade gold-antimony mineralization and step-out holes expanding the limits of gold mineralization beyond previously defined mineral resource boundaries. Results from West End drilling continue to expand the known limits of gold mineralization, both at depth and laterally from boundaries reported in mineral resource estimates released May 2012, and demonstrate the presence of higher grades within the overall mineral resource.

Some of the more significant assay results from the most recent holes are highlighted in Table 1, below, with more detailed results in Table 2 at the end of this release. Additional results from the ongoing program will be released when assays are received and validated.

Table 1: Highlights of Recent Drill Results from Golden Meadows

Hole ID	Hole Type	Area	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony %
MGI-12-223 (1)	Core	Yellow Pine	44.5	89.3	44.8	2.26	9.3	0.59
MGI-12-241	Core	Yellow Pine	7.6	50.3	42.7	3.63	1.8	0.00
MGI-12-258	Core	West End	42.4	151.8	109.4	1.30	2.4	0.00
And			162.5	208.0	45.6	2.81	2.8	0.01
Including			167.0	177.7	10.7	5.57	2.8	0.02
MGI-12-263	Core	Yellow Pine	102.0	143.0	41.0	2.54	1.6	0.00
MGI-12-265	Core	West End	71.6	114.3	42.7	2.61	4.0	0.01
And			122.8	152.1	29.3	2.98	3.0	0.01
MGI-12-281 (2)	Core	Yellow Pine	186.4	281.6	95.3	2.80	1.8	0.00
MGI-12-282	Core	West End	46.3	87.8	41.5	2.89	2.5	0.00
MGI-12-284 (1)	RC	West End	51.8	74.7	22.9	2.12	1.6	0.01
And			80.8	131.1	50.3	3.22	2.9	0.06
Including			86.9	118.9	32.0	4.60	3.9	0.08
MGI-12-286 (1)	Core	West End	265.0	375.4	110.3	2.23	1.7	0.00
Including			278.7	305.4	26.7	3.97	1.5	0.00
MGI-12-293 (1)(2)	Core	Yellow Pine	124.4	257.0	132.6	3.56	9.7	0.43
Including			180.8	217.6	36.9	4.92	14.2	1.51

(1) Based upon the current 3D interpretation of the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits the intervals quoted here are at or near true thickness and are composited using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off and may include short intervals of internal waste below the cut-off grade. Intervals denoted(1) may be oriented oblique to the trend of the mineralization and true thicknesses may be less than the interval reported. Actual true thicknesses will be determined through 3D modeling as part of the resource estimation process.
(2) These holes bottomed in mineralization.

“We are pleased with the recent results from our ongoing drilling program at our Golden Meadows Project, particularly at Yellow Pine, where recent metallurgical holes have confirmed the presence of high-grade gold-silver-antimony mineralization delineated in historic drill holes,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “Additional drill results from step-out holes continue to expand the known limits of gold mineralization beyond the boundaries utilized in the mineral resource estimates, both at the Yellow Pine and the West End deposits, demonstrating that we have yet to define the limits of these large mineralized systems,” he said. “Also encouraging is the presence of intercepts at West End with grades well above the average of the mineral resource estimate.” Drilling planned for the fall and winter program is aimed at continuing efforts to convert inferred Yellow Pine mineral resources utilized in Midas Gold’s recent Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”), highlights of which were reported in a news release dated September 4, 2012, to the indicated category and defining the limits of mineralization around the deposit. Additional drilling is also planned to further define the nature and extent of gold-antimony mineralization within the recently reported Scout prospect, to further evaluate the Hangar Flats deposit and to complete geotechnical holes for pit wall stability evaluations.

2012 Drill Program
Midas has completed over 38,000m of core and RC drilling as part of its 2012 drilling program, and currently has four core rigs operating on site after having as many as nine rigs operating over the summer months. Drill results will be utilized to update independent mineral resource estimates for all three know mineral deposits (Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine) by Q2/13 which will support a more detailed PEA or Pre-feasibility Study targeted for completion in the second half of 2013.

Yellow Pine
Results from thirty holes, drilled to in-fill and step-out from the Yellow Pine pit area and Homestake portions of the Yellow Pine deposit, are reported herein and are located on a map accompanying this release. A number of these holes were drilled around the periphery of the deposit, testing for the limits of the mineralization, where results were expected to not be as strong as in the main part of the mineralized system.

Drill hole MGI-12-293, which was completed to collect material for metallurgical testing and to verify historic assay data, intercepted a thick interval grading 3.56g/t Au, 9.7g/t Ag and 0.43% Sb over 132.6m. This intercept includes a zone within the central portion of the high-grade antimony zone assaying 4.92g/t Au, 14.2g/t Ag and 1.51% Sb over 36.9m. Other significant gold-silver-antimony intercepts include hole MGI-12-223, which cut 2.26g/t Au, 9.3g/t Ag and 0.59% Sb over 44.8m. Since these hole was drilled oblique to the trend of the mineralization due to constraints on collar locations, true thicknesses may be less than the interval reported. Antimony mineralization in the Yellow Pine deposit constitutes a significant potential by-product revenue source in the early years of the preliminary mine plan outlined in Midas Gold’s PEA.

In-fill holes completed to date have generally confirmed inferred mineral resources in the Yellow Pine deposit, with some zones assaying higher grade than predicted and others reporting slightly narrower zones of mineralization than modeled. Drill holes completed from the east side of the historic 1940s – 1950s open-pit in the central portion of the Yellow Pine deposit cut a thicker zone of unmineralized fault material than was modeled in the mineral resource estimate but overall continue to validate inferred mineral resources within the high-grade core of the deposit, including 2.80g/t Au over 95.3m intercepted in hole MGI-12-281.

Five hundred metres to the northeast, in the Homestake portion of the Yellow Pine deposit, recently completed drill holes continue to extend known gold mineralization on the east side of a fault previously thought to limit mineral resources. Previously reported RC drill holes intercepted high grade gold within and across this structure. Step-out diamond drill holes completed this summer have identified extensions of this zone to the northeast, along strike and within metasedimentary units on the southeast side of the structure. Recent intercepts include 2.54g/t Au over 41.0m (MGI-12-263), 1.31g/t Au over 33.7m (MGI-12-276), and 1.45g/t Au over 19.8m (MGI-12-267) and 1.26g/t Au over 23.5m (MGI-12-267). This near-surface zone remains open along strike and at depth.

West End
Results for fifteen drill holes completed this summer in the West End deposit are reported herein and are located on a map accompanying this release.

Recent drilling within the deposit has successfully confirmed the presence of inferred gold mineralization at depth, within the main structural corridor, including some higher grade intercepts within the overall mineral resource such as 3.22g/t Au over 50.3m (including 4.60g/t Au over 32.0m) in hole MGI-12-284 and 3.97g/t Au over 26.7m (MGI-12-286). Recent intercepts occurring within or just below the conceptual resource-limiting pit include 2.23g/t Au over 110.3m (MGI-12-286), 2.81g/t Au over 45.6m (MGI-12-258) and 1.88g/t Au over 52.6m (MGI-12-254). Other drill holes have intercepted significant gold mineralization in the footwall of the main structural corridor, including hole MGI-12-273, cutting 1.52g/t Au over 76.8m. This deposit remains open at depth and to the east beyond the limits of the resource-limiting gold shells and conceptual pits utilized in the mineral resource estimate reported in May of 2012.

Hangar Flats
Results for five drill holes completed this summer are reported herein and are located on a map accompanying this release.

The majority of drill holes reported herein were completed to verify the lateral continuity of shallowly dipping mineralized zones extending northeast from the main structural corridor of the Hangar Flats deposit. Recent moderate-grade and moderate-width drill intercepts in this area are generally consistent with the inferred mineral resources modeled in this domain, as reported in the mineral resource estimate released June 2012. These include 1.33 g/t Au over 35.7m (MGI-12-189) and 0.78 g/t Au over 21.2m (MGI-12-216). This drilling has further verified the conceptual model for the deposit of high-grade gold-antimony mineralization occurring within the structural corridor of the Meadow Creek Fault Zone and horse-tailing into thinner, lower grade zones to the east.

Illustrations
To view the locations of current drill holes, please click here.

Quality Assurance
The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The exploration activities at Golden Meadows were carried out under the supervision of Richard Moses, CPG, Qualified Person and Site Operations Manager for the Golden Meadows Project.

All gold assays are by a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by an atomic absorption finish (with a 0.002g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 6g/t are re-analyzed using a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. All composites utilize a 0.5g/t cut off and may include up to 6 metres of internal waste. Internal waste has been assigned a nominal grade of 0.0g/t. Composites above cut-off grade, but less than 10 metres in length, are not reported. Silver is analyzed via a 4-acid digestion followed by an ICP finish (with a 1.0g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 10g/t Ag are reanalyzed using a 50g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. Some intervals may not add or subtract correctly due to rounding, but are deemed insignificant. Analyses are carried out by ALS CHEMEX in their Reno and Winnemucca, Nevada and Vancouver, British Columbia laboratories. Umpire samples are routinely submitted to third party labs and blank and standard samples are used for quality assurance and quality control and a review of the results of analyses of the blanks, standards and duplicates by the Company’s Qualified Person indicates values are within normal and acceptable ranges.

Previous 2011 and 2012 assay results were reported in other news releases that can be found on Midas Gold’s web site at www.midasgoldcorp.com.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project
Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc., and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated June 27, 2012 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho” dated September 21, 2012 (the “Technical Report”) is available under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. The Preliminary Economic Assessment outlines a concept for the development of a large scale, long life, low cost open pit gold mining operation producing gold and by-product antimony based on the estimated mineral resource, as well as outlining a number of opportunities for potential enhancement of the conceptual project.

Hangar Flats is a high-grade gold-silver-antimony-tungsten discovery made in 2009 and these most recent drill intercepts are step-outs to the north from the areas discovered and drilled during the 2009 and 2010 field seasons. Yellow Pine is a significant past producer of gold, silver, antimony and tungsten from the 1930s through the mid-1950s. The Homestake deposit is located at the northeast end of the Yellow Pine deposit and was operated by Hecla Mining Company from 1987 through 1989. The area between Yellow Pine and Homestake, known as the Clark Tunnel prospect, was the site of early 1930’s and 1940’s era exploration, but no mining has occurred and it has seen only minimal modern exploration drilling. Historical geologic, ground geophysical and drilling data obtained by Midas suggested the possibility that significant mineralization might be present in this area and recent drill results confirm this potential. The West End deposit was the site of open pit mining with heap leach recovery of gold from the 1970s to the late 1990s.

The Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits remain open to expansion along strike and to depth. In addition, Midas Gold continues to review and assess information contained within an extensive exploration database developed by Midas Gold from almost 100 years of exploration activity by multiple owners and operators with the objective of identifying opportunities for the potential discovery of additional gold mineralization.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; the success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms; the exchange rates for the U.S. and Canadian currencies in 2012 will be consistent with the Corporation’s expectations; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table 2: Assay Results to Accompany Midas Gold Corp. News Release dated September 24, 2012

Hole ID	Target Area	Hole Type	Bearing	Inclination	Total Depth (m)	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)	Tungsten (%)
MGI-12-189	Hangar Flats	Core	140	-88	306.6	138.4	174.0	35.7	1.33	0.9	0.005	0.003
MGI-12-216	Hangar Flats	Core	314	-53	400.8	28.4	41.2	12.8	1.03	1.3	0.004	0.003
And						110.6	122.2	11.6	1.33	1.9	0.025	0.003
And						237.1	258.3	21.2	0.78	1.7	0.020	0.003
MGI-12-220	Hangar Flats	Core	320	-65	322.0	148.1	165.5	17.4	1.78	0.8	0.005	0.006
And						203.3	226.5	23.2	1.93	6.1	0.304	0.003
And						248.7	270.8	22.1	0.64	63.1	0.058	0.069
MGI-12-221	Yellow Pine	Core	110	-55	345.3	116.0	127.9	11.9	0.62	1.1	0.002	0.001
And						272.0	290.3	18.3	0.87	0.8	0.002	0.002
MGI-12-223 (2)	Yellow Pine	Core	292	-89.5	203.6	44.5	89.3	44.8	2.26	9.3	0.592	0.002
MGI-12-224	Yellow Pine	Core	120	-79	310.1	167.5	233.5	66.0	1.21	1.0	0.004	0.002
And						257.3	310.1	52.9	2.08	1.9	0.005	0.001
Including						268.5	292.3	23.8	3.81	2.7	0.005	0.001
MGI-12-226	Yellow Pine	Core	0	-90	225.6	61.0	113.1	52.1	1.29	1.5	0.026	0.008
MGI-12-229	Hangar Flats	Core	0	-90	464.5	436.2	448.1	11.9	2.30	8.4	0.327	0.003
MGI-12-231	Yellow Pine	Core	120	-70	334.7	257.6	285.0	27.4	1.95	3.9	0.227	0.001
MGI-12-232	Yellow Pine	Core	300	-65.5	252.8	196.8	207.1	10.4	0.64	0.4	0.002	0.001
MGI-12-233	Yellow Pine	Core	300	-81	293.7	127.4	139.5	12.0	0.50	1.1	0.004	0.003
And						203.6	218.1	14.5	0.78	1.1	0.002	0.002
And						248.9	259.5	10.7	1.11	0.2	0.002	0.001
MGI-12-234	Hangar Flats	Core	0	-90	341.1	39.9	77.6	37.6	1.54	2.0	0.123	0.005
Including						39.9	53.8	13.9	2.76	3.1	0.093	0.005
And						88.7	104.6	15.9	1.82	2.2	0.006	0.159
MGI-12-235	Yellow Pine	Core	89	-50	258.2	167.0	185.0	18.0	0.76	1.6	0.006	0.002
MGI-12-236	Yellow Pine	Core	300	-70	398.7	299.2	315.0	15.9	1.08	2.7	0.005	0.002
And						334.8	361.2	26.4	1.01	4.2	0.022	0.002
And						367.3	377.3	10.1	0.66	1.3	0.002	0.002
MGI-12-241	Yellow Pine	Core	120	-45	201.8	7.6	50.3	42.7	3.63	1.8	0.003	0.003
And						58.2	89.8	31.5	1.18	1.6	0.003	0.003
And						145.7	157.6	11.9	0.79	1.3	0.004	0.002
MGI-12-242	Yellow Pine	Core	119	-49.5	278.1	209.4	221.3	11.9	1.88	0.9	0.002	0.001
MGI-12-243	Yellow Pine	Core	120	-73	379.5	214.9	265.6	50.8	0.96	1.7	0.004	0.003
And						295.5	307.4	11.9	1.33	0.5	0.003	0.001
And						351.3	361.5	10.2	1.01	0.3	0.002	0.000
MGI-12-248	Yellow Pine	Core	120	-45	217.6	68.9	94.6	25.8	0.79	1.8	0.003	0.004
And						102.6	138.8	36.3	0.86	1.4	0.004	0.002
MGI-12-252	Yellow Pine	Core	120	-70	376.1	269.1	287.1	18.0	0.58	1.2	0.002	0.000
And						294.9	360.4	65.5	1.49	8.2	0.408	0.001
Including						326.1	344.3	18.1	2.64	1.1	0.002	0.001
MGI-12-253	Yellow Pine	Core	176	-70	314.3	35.1	46.8	11.7	0.77	1.5	0.002	0.001
And						109.1	124.4	15.2	0.90	1.1	0.004	0.002
And						154.2	164.7	10.5	1.05	1.1	0.003	0.001
And						250.9	275.4	24.5	0.60	0.8	0.003	0.001
And						287.1	314.3	27.1	0.68	1.0	0.002	0.001
MGI-12-254 (2)	West End	Core	333	-76	315.6	220.1	272.6	52.6	1.88	2.8	0.009	0.002
Including						249.8	263.5	13.7	2.57	1.9	0.010	0.002
MGI-12-255 (2)	West End	Core	278	-77	343.5	225.3	265.0	39.8	1.80	2.2	0.016	0.003
Including						236.7	259.1	22.4	2.68	2.7	0.016	0.003
MGI-12-258	West End	Core	324	-82	356.0	42.4	151.8	109.4	1.30	2.4	0.005	0.001
Including						122.2	151.8	29.6	2.40	2.2	0.006	0.001
And						162.5	208.0	45.6	2.81	2.8	0.011	0.003
Including						167.0	177.7	10.7	5.57	2.8	0.017	0.004
And						253.6	285.6	32.0	1.29	0.5	0.003	0.002
MGI-12-259	Yellow Pine	Core	152	-55	310.9	24.8	40.7	15.9	1.34	1.6	0.003	0.002
And						75.6	90.1	14.5	2.21	2.4	0.004	0.002
And						106.5	133.2	26.7	0.64	1.0	0.002	0.002
MGI-12-260	West End	RC	0	-90	294.1	61.0	85.3	24.4	1.26	3.3	0.009	0.002
And						173.7	207.3	33.5	1.72	1.3	0.003	0.002
And						216.4	245.4	29.0	0.70	1.4	0.006	0.001
MGI-12-261	Yellow Pine	Core	120	-52	410.6	143.6	155.0	11.4	0.68	1.3	0.002	0.004
And						180.1	201.8	21.6	0.86	1.3	0.002	0.002
And						252.8	264.7	11.9	0.60	5.0	0.006	0.001
And						399.8	410.6	10.8	0.52	0.7	0.001	0.001
MGI-12-263	Yellow Pine	Core	119	-60	252.1	102.0	143.0	41.0	2.54	1.6	0.003	0.002
And						185.8	203.6	17.8	0.83	2.2	0.004	0.001
And						213.4	228.9	15.5	0.80	0.0	0.001	0.001
MGI-12-265	West End	Core	307	-65	344.1	71.6	114.3	42.7	2.61	4.0	0.013	0.002
And						122.8	152.1	29.3	2.98	3.0	0.013	0.004
And						205.7	216.4	10.7	1.02	1.1	0.002	0.002
And						224.9	238.4	13.4	0.66	0.0	0.001	0.000
MGI-12-266	Yellow Pine	Core	85	-48.5	223.4	27.0	54.9	27.9	0.72	0.7	0.003	0.001
And						65.8	99.1	33.2	3.14	1.6	0.038	0.001
Including						67.8	85.7	17.8	5.20	2.2	0.068	0.001
MGI-12-267	Yellow Pine	Core	120	-45	173.7	12.5	32.3	19.8	1.45	1.1	0.003	0.005
And						83.2	106.7	23.5	1.26	2.2	0.002	0.002
And						120.4	133.2	12.8	0.52	0.9	0.001	0.000
And						142.3	158.0	15.7	2.96	0.9	0.002	0.005
MGI-12-270	Yellow Pine	Core	300	-54	212.5	191.7	203.6	11.9	0.85	0.5	0.002	0.001
MGI-12-272	Yellow Pine	Core	61	-64	221.0	56.7	70.6	13.9	0.91	0.8	0.003	0.003
And						88.4	112.2	23.8	1.00	0.9	0.003	0.002
And						130.0	145.9	15.9	0.60	0.8	0.003	0.002
MGI-12-273 (2)	West End	Core	104	-76	381.6	121.2	135.2	14.0	1.06	0.5	0.047	0.001
And						157.3	176.9	19.7	2.95	3.1	0.010	0.002
And						187.5	201.3	13.9	1.58	1.4	0.007	0.002
And						246.9	323.7	76.8	1.52	1.3	0.015	0.004
Including						254.8	266.7	11.9	2.58	1.0	0.005	0.003
And						351.1	361.3	10.2	0.51	2.2	0.012	0.001
MGI-12-274	West End	RC	0	-90	182.9	16.8	48.8	32.0	1.30	0.5	0.009	0.001
And						59.4	97.5	38.1	2.26	5.0	0.030	0.004
Including						85.3	97.5	12.2	4.67	7.8	0.031	0.009
MGI-12-276	Yellow Pine	Core	120	-45	91.4	35.7	69.3	33.7	1.31	3.5	0.005	0.003
Including						51.4	63.4	12.0	2.28	3.0	0.005	0.003
MGI-12-278	Yellow Pine	Core	118	-66	257.3	118.9	132.7	13.9	0.91	0.5	0.002	0.002
MGI-12-279	Yellow Pine	Core	0	-90	277.7	264.7	277.7	13.0	1.00	0.5	0.002	0.001
MGI-12-280	West End	RC	300	-65	239.3	117.4	131.1	13.7	1.62	2.9	0.011	0.004
And						137.2	184.4	47.2	1.20	0.9	0.008	0.002
And						219.5	239.3	19.8	1.64	0.6	0.007	0.002
MGI-12-281 (3)	Yellow Pine	Core	300	-55	281.6	87.6	107.8	20.1	0.55	2.3	0.005	0.002
And						117.7	133.5	15.9	0.98	1.7	0.003	0.000
And						186.4	281.6	95.3	2.80	1.8	0.005	0.002
Including						188.4	232.0	43.6	3.34	1.9	0.003	0.002
Including						255.6	281.6	26.1	2.81	1.9	0.008	0.002
MGI-12-282	West End	Core	300	-72.5	380.7	46.3	87.8	41.5	2.89	2.5	0.005	0.003
Including						54.9	69.8	14.9	4.00	1.0	0.005	0.004
And						313.9	326.8	12.8	0.70	1.6	0.002	0.000
MGI-12-284 (2)	West End	RC	0	-90	192.0	7.6	19.8	12.2	0.70	2.4	0.007	0.001
And						51.8	74.7	22.9	2.12	1.6	0.010	0.002
And						80.8	131.1	50.3	3.22	2.9	0.064	0.002
Including						86.9	118.9	32.0	4.60	3.9	0.084	0.003
MGI-12-285	Yellow Pine	Core	300	-36	119.5	84.7	115.5	30.8	1.57	5.1	0.112	0.002
MGI-12-286 (2)	West End	Core	0	-90	417.0	265.0	375.4	110.3	2.23	1.7	0.004	0.002
Including						278.7	305.4	26.7	3.97	1.5	0.004	0.003
MGI-12-287	West End	RC	0	-90	109.7	77.7	88.4	10.7	1.08	0.3	0.008	0.001
MGI-12-290 (2)	West End	Core	298	-71	322.2	106.4	117.0	10.7	1.55	0.9	0.019	0.003
And						232.3	282.6	50.3	1.00	0.9	0.003	0.001
MGI-12-291	Yellow Pine	Core	299	-51	255.4	221.0	247.0	26.1	2.24	5.2	0.182	0.002
Including						224.8	244.9	20.1	2.63	6.2	0.233	0.002
MGI-12-293 (2) (3)	Yellow Pine	Core	310	-40	257.0	86.9	117.0	30.2	0.77	3.2	0.108	0.003
And						124.4	257.0	132.6	3.56	9.7	0.425	0.002
Including						180.8	217.6	36.9	4.92	14.2	1.506	0.002
MGI-12-294	West End	Core	300	-82	360.3	31.1	43.3	12.2	0.87	4.0	0.011	0.003
And						91.7	108.1	16.3	1.86	2.0	0.020	0.002
MGI-12-295 (1)	West End	Core	0	-90	378.5	8.5	27.3	18.8	1.32	4.4	0.007	0.003
And						168.4	179.5	11.1	0.67	0.0	0.003	0.001

(1) The bottom portions of these holes are incomplete and are not reported.
(2) Based upon the current 3D interpretation of the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits the intervals quoted here are generally at or near true thickness and are composited using a 0.5 g/t Au cut-off and may include short intervals of internal waste below the cut-off grade. Intervals denoted (2) may be oriented oblique to the trend of the mineralization and true thicknesses may be less than the interval reported. Actual true thicknesses will be determined through 3D modeling as part of the resource estimation process.
(3) These holes bottomed in mineralization.

MIDAS GOLD FILES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR GOLDEN MEADOWS PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT ON SEDAR

Study Demonstrates Potential for Robust, Long-life, Low Cost Gold Production with Antimony Credits

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced that it has filed an independent Technical Report (“Technical Report”) on SEDAR detailing the results of the recent Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA” or “Study”) on its Golden Meadows Project (the “Project”) in Idaho. As summarized in a news release dated September 4, 2012, the Study demonstrates the potential for a robust return from a long life, low cost gold operation with important antimony by-product credits. In addition, the Study outlines a number of opportunities for further optimization of the Project including, but not limited to:

Potential for increased throughput while maintaining a single process line, keeping capital cost increases modest;

Potential additions to the higher grade resources (either in and around the currently known mineral resources or from new discoveries) that would extend the period of higher grade production beyond Year 8, deferring lower grade, lower margin production to later years;

Conversion of some portions of the currently unclassified material within the Study pit limits that are currently treated as waste, potentially increasing mineral resources and reducing strip ratios;

Potential for expanded delineation of antimony by-product credits within the gold mineral resource, since only 17% of the gold mineral resources currently have antimony values estimated, increasing and/or extending the potential by-product credit revenue stream; and,

Exploration upside through the potential discovery of significant new gold deposits, with or without by-product antimony credits.

Midas Gold is currently working to realize on all of the opportunities listed above, including a significant amount of infill, step-out and exploration drilling completed subsequent to the PEA cut-off date, but the outcomes of such activities cannot yet be determined.

“The full technical report provides readers with the opportunity to understand the level of detail and analysis that went into completing this Preliminary Economic Assessment,” said Stephen Quin, President & CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “The Study also outlines the risks and opportunities that will be addressed as Midas Gold advances its Golden Meadows Project and provides a clear outline of its plans to manage and mitigate the impacts of its current and future activities, as well as leaving this extensively disturbed brownfields site in significantly better condition than it currently is.”

Readers should note that the PEA mine plan and economic model include the use of inferred mineral resources. Inferred mineral resources are considered to be too speculative to be used in an economic analysis except as allowed for by Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) in PEA studies. There is no guarantee that inferred mineral resources can be converted to indicated or measured mineral resources and, as such, there is no guarantee the Project economics described in the PEA will be achieved.

As previously reported, the purpose of the Study was to (a) provide a preliminary concept for the scale and type of mining project that the Golden Meadows Project could support, (b) identify options and alternatives for consideration by Midas in consultation with regulators, governments, communities and other interested parties, (c) identify areas where additional work is required before a preliminary feasibility study (“PFS”) can be completed, and (d) demonstrate potential for positive economic returns that would support continued investment in the Golden Meadows Project. With this Study in hand, Midas Gold intends to actively engage with interested parties to evaluate potential options and considerations for the possible development of this large scale, long life mining operation in order to manage and mitigate impacts and ensure the sustainability of Midas Gold’s activities.

The Golden Meadows property has been the site of extensive open pit and underground mining for almost 100 years and, as such, has seen considerable disturbance and environmental impact. Midas Gold’s approach to the conceptual design of this project has been to select economic approaches and alternatives that mitigate and minimize the results of its proposed activities, to remediate considerable amounts of legacy disturbance and to develop a closure and reclamation concept that leaves the site with enhanced fisheries, wetlands and other productive environmental attributes. Midas Gold plans to engage with regulators, governments, communities, tribes, non-governmental agencies and other interested parties to consider the options identified in the PEA, to evaluate reasonable alternatives and to develop preferred options that can be incorporated into a future PFS and, if warranted, the permitting process for a full-scale mining operation.

“Our objective is to balance the potential for economic returns to our shareholders, to generate significant fiscal and employment benefits to the local communities and the State of Idaho, while protecting and enhancing the local environment and eco-system,” said Mr. Quin. “We believe that an appropriate balance can be reached and we look forward to working with regulators, governments, communities and other interested parties to realize that end.”

Compliance with National Instrument 43-101

The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person.

Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Mineral resource estimates do not account for mineability, selectivity, mining loss and dilution. These mineral resource estimates include inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is also no certainty that these inferred mineral resources will be converted to the measured and indicated categories through further drilling, or into mineral reserves, once economic considerations are applied.

The mineral resources at Golden Meadows are contained within areas that have seen historic disturbance resulting from prior mining activities. In order for Midas Gold to advance its interests at Golden Meadows, the Project will be subject to a number of Federal, State and local laws and regulations and will require permit to conduct its activities. However, Midas Gold is not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal or other reasons that would prevent it from advancing the Project.

For readers to fully understand the information in this news release and the PEA, they should read the Technical Report (available on SEDAR) in its entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions and exclusions that relate to the information set out in this news release which qualifies the Technical Information. The Technical Report intended to be read as a whole, and summaries or sections should not be read or relied upon out of context. The technical information in that report is subject to the assumptions and qualifications contained in the Technical Report.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” “confirm” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “contemplates”, “recommends” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, certain assumptions as to production rate, operating cost, recovery and metal costs as set out in this news release, that any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms; the exchange rates for the U.S. and Canadian currencies in 2012 will be consistent with the Corporation’s expectations; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

MIDAS GOLD COMPLETES POSITIVE PRELIMINARY ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT FOR GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT, IDAHO

Study Demonstrates Potential for Robust, Long-life, Low Cost Gold Production with Antimony Credits

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced the results of an independent, National Instrument 43-101 compliant Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA” or “Study”) completed on its Golden Meadows Project (the “Project”) in Idaho as summarized in Table 1 below. The purpose of the Study was to (a) provide a preliminary concept for the scale and type of mining project that the Golden Meadows Project could support, (b) identify options and alternatives for consideration by Midas Gold in consultation with regulators, governments, communities and other interested parties, (c) identify areas where additional work is required before a pre-feasibility study (“PFS”) can be completed, and (d) demonstrate potential for positive economic returns that would support continued investment in the Golden Meadows Project. With this Study in hand, Midas Gold intends to actively engage with interested parties to evaluate potential options and considerations for the possible development of this large scale, long life mining operation in order to manage and mitigate impacts and ensure the sustainability of Midas Gold’s activities.

The Golden Meadows property has been the site of extensive open pit and underground mining for almost 100 years and, as such, has seen considerable disturbance and environmental impact. Midas Gold’s approach to the conceptual design of this project has been to select economic approaches and alternatives that mitigate and minimize the results of its proposed activities, to remediate considerable amounts of legacy disturbance and to develop a closure and reclamation concept that leaves the site with enhanced fisheries, wetlands and other productive environmental attributes. Midas Gold plans to engage with regulators, governments, communities, tribes, non-governmental agencies and other interested parties to consider the options identified in the PEA, to evaluate reasonable alternatives and to develop preferred options that can be incorporated into a future PFS and, if warranted, the permitting process for a full-scale mining operation.

Table 1: Preliminary Economic Assessment Highlights, Golden Meadows Project, Idaho(1)
(Base Case, at US$1,400/oz of gold)

	Years 1-8		Life-Of-Mine (14.2 years)
	Annual Average	Total	Annual Average	Total
Payable Gold (K oz)	390	3,121	348	4,922
Payable Antimony (M lbs)	9.9	79.3	6.4	90.6
Cash Costs (US$/oz)(2) (Net of by-product credits)	331		425
Initial Capital (US$M)				879
Pre-tax NPV5% (US$M)				2,136
After-tax NPV5% (US$M)				1,482
IRR (Pre-tax/After-tax)				33.7%/27.2%
After-tax Payback (Production Years)				3.0

(1) In this release, “M” = million, “K” = thousands, all amounts in US$
(2) See non-IFRS measures below

“This Preliminary Economic Assessment demonstrates potential for a robust, long life, low cost mining operation at Golden Meadows that could be in the lowest quartile of global gold producers,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “The Study provides the basis for us to engage the various interested parties in discussions related to the options and scenarios laid out, and to work with them to determine the optimal and preferred options. The Golden Meadows Project represents a tremendous opportunity to create significant long term, well paid employment in an economically depressed part of Idaho, generate a substantial stream of revenue to county, state and federal governments, to remediate and improve the environmental sustainability of this heavily disturbed site, and to create attractive returns for our shareholders,” he said. “With a positive Study in hand, we have the basis from which to enter into meaningful discussions with interested parties to ensure we understand their perspectives, collect their input and consider options to improve and enhance the conceptual plan laid out in the PEA.”

Conference Call, Webcast and Conferences

Midas Gold will be hosting a conference call and webcast to discuss highlights of the PEA at 7:00 AM PDT on Wednesday September 5, 2012. Details are provided toward the end of this news release.

Midas Gold is also attending and presenting at the Precious Metals Summit in Vail, Colorado, on September 6-7, 2012, and is attending the Gold Forum in Denver, Colorado, September 9-12, 2012.

Preliminary Economic Assessment

The PEA was compiled by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (“SRK”) who was engaged by Midas Gold Corp.’s wholly owned subsidiary, Midas Gold, Inc. (“MGI”), to evaluate potential options for the conceptual development of a mine at the Golden Meadows Project based on information available up to the date of the Study. Ausenco Solutions Canada Inc. (infrastructure and mineral processing); Blue Coast Metallurgy Ltd. (metallurgy); RTR Resource Management, Inc. (permitting and social and environmental considerations), and JDS Energy and Mining Inc. (project management and economic analysis) also contributed to the Study. Additional details are provided in a technical report to be filed on SEDAR by mid-September 2012.

Midas Gold instructed SRK and the other Study contributors to conduct the PEA with the sustainable operation and long-term reclamation of the Project as a key design consideration, with the intent to build a project that would eventually result in an improvement of the environmental conditions that currently exist at Golden Meadows due to historic mining in the area.

The PEA summarized in this news release is intended to provide only an initial, high-level review of the Project potential and design options, which is preliminary in nature. The PEA mine plan and economic model include the use of Inferred resources. Inferred resources are considered to be too speculative geologically to be used in an economic analysis except as permitted under NI43-101 in PEA studies. There is no guarantee that Inferred resources can be converted to Indicated or Measured resources, and as such, there is no certainty the Project economics described herein will be realized.

Project Concept

The preliminary designs presented in the PEA are based on the recognition that the site has been previously extensively mined and thus considerations were made for economic feasibility, mitigation or cleanup of “targeted” legacy environmental issues, improvement of water quality, minimizing mining-related disturbance, and protection of the fishery during operations and on mine closure. In formulating the mine closure, consideration was given to re-establishment of the upstream fishery, backfilling open pits (when appropriate) as part of waste management, and focusing meeting applicable water quality standards during operation with mechanical treatment and on passive water treatment for long term closure. Additional details of these considerations are provided in the ‘Environmental’, ‘Closure and Remediation’ and ‘Permitting’ sections below.

The Project, as currently envisioned, consists of three gold mineral resources with zones of antimony and silver mineralization located in an area of significant historic mining activity. Conventional open pit methods are recommended for mining the three deposits (Yellow Pine, Hangar Flats, and West End), all of which are located within three kilometres of each other.

The deposits contain oxide and sulphide mineralization that are contemplated to be treated with different extraction processes. The oxide material is amenable to milling and then vat leaching to recover gold and silver only. Sulphide materialization is recommended to be milled and treated with sequential flotation to produce two products: an antimony concentrate for off-site shipment to a third party smelter and a gold concentrate that would be further processed on site using pressure oxidation (POX) followed by vat leaching and cyanide destruction within the plant building to produce gold-silver doré.

Production is assumed to be nominally 20,000 t/d or 7.3 Mt/year of mill feed. With this assumed production rate, the mine life would be approximately 14.2 years, with approximately 101 Mt of material processed. The mine would have an overall strip ratio of 3.7 tonnes of waste rock per tonne of economic mineralized rock. Gold accounts for approximately 93% of the value of the payable metals, antimony accounts for about 7% of the payable value and silver has a negligible economic contribution.

Mineral Resources

Updated mineral resources were estimated for each of the three deposits that comprise the Golden Meadows Project. The mineral resource estimates are summarized in Table 2 below and were previously reported by deposit in news releases dated May 16, 2012, June 4, 2012 and June 27, 2012. Antimony and silver values were only estimated within certain limited sub-domains and are summarized in Table 3 below. As a result, the grades for these metals in Table 2 are reported averaged over the entire, much larger gold mineral resource volumes, which may underrepresent the overall grades for these metals.

Table 2: Mineral Resource Estimate(1) - All Three Deposits comprising the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho

Prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., June 25, 2012

Mineral Resource Category	Tonnes (000s)	Gold Grade (g/t)	Contained Gold (000s oz)	Silver Grade(5) (g/t)	Contained Silver (000s oz)	Antimony Grade(4)(5) (%)	Contained Antimony (000s lbs)
Open Pit Oxide(2) Mineral Resources
Indicated	10,573	0.90	305	0.00	-	0.00%	122
Inferred	2,201	0.97	68	0.00	-	0.00%	178
Open Pit Sulphide(3) Mineral Resources
Indicated	67,653	1.80	3,925	0.60	1,312	0.07%	108,385
Inferred	53,917	1.63	2,822	0.93	1,603	0.08%	92,606
Total Open Pit Oxide + Sulphide(2)(3) Mineral Resources
Indicated	78,226	1.68	4,229	0.52	1,312	0.06%	108,507
Inferred	56,117	1.60	2,890	0.89	1,603	0.07%	92,784

(1) Mineral resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability - see “Compliance with NI43-101” below. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. All composites have been capped where appropriate.

(2) Open pit oxide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.42 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (as detailed in June 27, 2012 news release).

(3) Open pit sulfide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.75 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (as detailed in June 27, 2012 news release).

(4) Where antimony grades are shown as “0.00” there is antimony present but it rounds to 0.00.
(5) Antimony and silver were not estimated for the entire West End deposit and significant portions of the Hangar Flats and Yellow Pine deposits due to a lack of sufficient assays, and these un-estimated volumes are averaged into the totals at an assumed zero grade.

Table 3: Antimony Subdomains(1) Mineral Resource, Yellow Pine & Hangar Flats Deposits
Prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., June 25, 2012 for the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho

Mineral Resource Category	Tonnes (000s)	Gold Grade (g/t)	Contained Gold (000s oz)	Silver Grade (g/t)	Contained Silver (000s oz)	Antimony Grade (%)	Contained Antimony (000s lbs)
Open Pit Sulphide(2) Mineral Resources
Indicated	9,999	2.31	743	3.15	1,012	0.49%	108,507
Inferred	8,639	2.08	576	5.04	1,400	0.49%	92,784

(1) Mineral resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability - see “Compliance with NI43-101” below. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. All composites have been capped where appropriate.

(2) Open pit sulphide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.75 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details below). The antimony subdomain is further limited to discrete zones of mineralization with grades that exceed 0.1% Sb.

Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Mineral resource estimates do not account for mineability, selectivity, mining loss and dilution. These mineral resource estimates include Inferred mineral resources that are normally considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is also no certainty that these Inferred mineral resources will be converted to Measured and Indicated mineral resource categories through further drilling, or into mineral reserves once economic considerations are applied.

The mineral resource estimates for the Hangar Flats, West End, and Yellow Pine deposits were prepared by SRK as summarized herein. The economically driven pit shell that limits the mineral resource was based entirely on gold value, with antimony and silver reporting within the resource-limiting pit but not defining it. Within the resource-limiting pit, antimony and silver grades are reported without any cut-off. Any mineralization lying outside the resource-limiting pit is not reported as mineral resources.

Since the date of this mineral resource estimate, additional drilling has been completed, and is continuing to infill and extend the mineralization reported herein and updated mineral resource estimates are targeted for the end of Q1/13.

Conceptual Life-of-mine Open Pit Production Schedule

Individual conceptual mine plans were developed for each of the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits. The conceptual Life-of-mine (“LOM”) plan is summarized in Table 4, which is attached at the end of this release. The mine plans utilized approximately 80% of the recently reported mineral resource for the Golden Meadows Project that is summarized above.

Processing

The gold in the three deposits comprising the Golden Meadows Project is primarily contained in pyrite and arsenopyrite, while the antimony is contained in stibnite, and silver in pyrite, arsenopyrite and stibnite. As a result, the mineralized material contemplated to be processed would be crushed, ground and sulphides recovered by sequential flotation of the stibnite and then, subsequently, the pyrite and arsenopyrite, yielding two concentrates. The mineralized material is considered to be of medium hardness, with bond ball mill work indexes ranging from 13.0 to 13.7kWh/t. The conceptual base case approach to the sulphide concentrates is for the stibnite (antimony, along with minor gold and silver) concentrate to be sold to third parties for processing, while the pyrite-arsenopyrite concentrate (containing the gold) will be pressure oxidized on site and gold recovered as doré. Based on metallurgical test work completed to date, recoveries utilized in the PEA are as set out in Table 5 below. The grade of the gold concentrate is designed to manage sulphur grades for onsite pressure oxidation; were the gold concentrates to be shipped off-site for processing, higher concentrations are achievable.

Table 5: Recoveries Utilized in PEA, Golden Meadows Project, Idaho

Process	Units	Yellow Pine	Hangar Flats	West End
Sulphides with Recoverable Antimony Grades
Antimony Flotation
Concentrate grade	% Sb	50	50	n/a
Recovery	%	80	80	n/a
Gold-bearing Sulphide Flotation
Concentrate grade	% Sulphur	10+	10+	n/a
Gold Flotation Recovery	%	88	89	n/a
POX Residue Gold Extraction	%	98	98	n/a
Overall Gold Recovery	%	86	87	n/a
Sulphides Without Recoverable Antimony Grades
Gold-bearing Sulphide Flotation
Concentrate grade	% Sulphur	10+	10+	10+
Recovery	%	93	92	Variable (1)
POX Residue Gold Extraction	%	98	98	98
Overall Gold Recovery	%	91	90	Variable (1)
Oxides
Gold Leach Extraction	%	80	80	Variable (1)

(1) Depending on degree of oxidation

Indicative economic analysis shows that the slightly lower overall gold recovery in the material with recoverable antimony is more than offset by the recoverable, payable antimony values.

Tailings & Waste Rock Management

A total of 101 Mt (68.7 Mm3) of tailings are expected to be produced during the 14.2-year mine life of the recommended project. Based on results of current metallurgical test work and the recommended processing options, three separate tailings streams would be produced: oxide, POX, and flotation tailings. The geochemistry of the POX and oxide tailings suggests they may require containment within a lined facility, while the flotation tailings are considered to be relatively benign and could be placed in a separate unlined facility. However, the buffering capacity of the flotation tailings may serve to neutralize the POX tailings, and create a more benign product overall, which suggests that co-mingled tailings contained within a single, lined facility may be the better option. The recommended tailing storage facility (“TSF”) would consist of a lined basin and lined rock fill dam constructed in stages throughout the LOM. The downstream face of the rock fill dam would be buttressed by the waste rock facility (“WRF”), substantially reinforcing the dam. Waste rock from the mining operations at West End is recommended to be backfilled into the Yellow Pine pit. Other waste rock is recommended to be deposited in a designed WRF adjacent to the Hangar Flats deposit. In order to schedule waste placement within the waste facilities and isolate potential leachable material, a detailed waste management plan would be developed, including components of geochemical characterization, water management, and capping to limit infiltration.

Capital Costs

Capital costs (“CAPEX”) estimates were done based on Q3 2012, un-escalated U.S. dollars and are summarized in Table 6 below. Vendor quotes were obtained for all major equipment. Some of the costs were developed from first principles, while some were estimated based on factored references and experience with similar projects.

Table 6: Capital Cost Estimate, Golden Meadows Project

Area	Detail	Pre-production (M$)	Sustaining (M$)	Total (M$)
Direct Costs	Open Pit Mine	121.9	107.2	229.1
	Processing and Utilities	243.0	79.6	322.6
	On-site Infrastructure	93.1	38.8	131.9
	Off-site Infrastructure	67.0	0.0	67.0
Indirect Costs		148.9	19.4	168.3
Owner’s Costs		39.7	0.0	39.7
Closure Costs		0.0	53.0	53.0
CAPEX Without Contingency		713.6	298.0	1,011.6
Contingency (variable)		165.7	4.7	170.4
TOTAL CAPEX ESTIMATE with Contingency		879.4	302.6	1,182.0

Operating Costs

Operating cost estimates (“OPEX”) were done based on Q3 2012, un-escalated U.S. dollars and are summarized in Table 7 below. Most costs were developed from first principles, although some were estimated based on factored references and experience with similar projects.

Table 7: Operating Cost Estimate, Golden Meadows Project

Item	Unit Cost Estimate
	$/t Mined	$/t Milled	Cash Cost(2) $/Au ounce Payable
Mining	1.67(1)	7.78	160
Mineral Processing		13.94	287
General and Administration		4.14	85
Total (without by-product credits)		25.86	532
Total (with by-product credits)			425

(1) Excluding pre-strip (Year -1) mining which is captured as a capital cost
(2) see non-IFRS measures below

In the first eight years of operation, cash costs without by-product credits average US$479 per payable ounce of gold, and just US$331 per payable oz of gold after by-product credits are applied (see non-IFRS measures below).

Costs were independently estimated for oxides, low-antimony sulphides and high-antimony sulphides, as set out in Table 8 below.

Table 8: Operating Cost Estimate by Type of Mineralization, Golden Meadows Project

Item	Unit	Combined	Oxide	Sulphide	High Sb
Mining ($1.67/tonne mined*)	$/t milled	7.78	7.78	7.78	7.78
Stockpile material handling	$/t milled	0.13	0.13	0.13	0.13
Crushing and Grinding	$/t milled	2.83	2.83	2.83	2.83
Oxide Processing	$/t oxide milled	0.82	5.53
Sb Flotation	$/t high Sb milled	0.28			1.66
Au Flotation	$/t sulphide milled	1.77		2.08	2.08
POX	$/t sulphide milled	7.87		9.23	9.23
Water Management	$/t milled	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.25
General and Administrative	$/t milled	4.14	4.14	4.14	4.14
Total		25.86	20.66	26.44	28.10

* Excluding pre-strip (Year -1) mining which is captured as a capital cost

Production Schedule

Based on the conceptual mining schedule for the three deposits and recoveries summarized above, Table 9 sets out the estimated contained and payable metals over the life-of mine and is attached at the end of this release.

Economic Analysis

The economic assessment in the PEA is preliminary in nature and uses inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that this PEA will be realized. The inferred mineral resource used in the mine plan is 37% of the total life-of-mine mineral resource.

Four potential cash flow cases were studied using metal prices summarized in Table 10 below. All cash flow cases used the same mineral resource estimate, mine plan and production factors, as shown in Table 11 below.

Table 10: Metal Price Assumptions for the Four Economic Cases, Golden Meadows PEA

Case	Gold Price ($/ounce)	Silver Price ($/ounce)	Antimony Price ($/pound)	Basis
Case A	1,200	20.00	5.50	Gold price used in the mine optimization. The gold price is approximately the 5-year trailing average to the end of July 2012.
Case B (Base Case)	1,400	23.50	6.00	Approximate three-year trailing average gold price to the end of July 2012.
Case C	1,600	27.00	6.50	Approximate eighteen-month trailing average gold price to the end of July 2012.
Case D	1,800	30.00	7.00	An upside case to show project potential at a gold price about 12% higher than prices at the end of July 2012.

Table 11: Summary of Production - All Cases, Golden Meadows PEA

Item	Unit	Value
LOM PRODUCTION
Waste Mined	Mt	372
Mineralized Material Mined	Mt	101
Strip Ratio (Waste tonnes:mineralized material tonnes)	t:t	3.7
Daily Mill Throughput	t/d	20,000
Annual Mill Throughput	Mt	7.3
Mine Life	Production Years	14.2
MILL HEAD GRADE - OVERALL
Gold	g/t Au	1.72
Silver	g/t Ag	1.60
Antimony	% Sb	0.08
Oxide Process
Tonnes	Mt	15.0
Gold	g/t Au	1.05
Silver	g/t Ag	0.10
Gold Flotation Process (excluding Antimony Flotation)
Tonnes	Mt	69.0
Gold	g/t Au	1.75
Silver	g/t Ag	0.42
Sb Flotation Process (>0.1% Sb only)
Tonnes	Mt	17.4
Gold	g/t Au	2.18
Silver	g/t Ag	0.67
Antimony	% Sb	0.45
CONCENTRATE PRODUCTION
Antimony Concentrate	dry metric tonnes	126,474
LOM PAYABLE METAL
Gold	Koz	4,922
Silver	Koz	335
Antimony	Klb	90,618

The results of the economic analysis are summarized in Table 12 below.

Table 12: Economic Results by Case, Golden Meadows PEA

Parameter	Unit	Pre-tax Results	After-tax Results
Case A ($1,200/ounce Au, $5.50/pound Sb, $20.00/ounce Ag)
NPV0%	M$	2,549	1,874
NPV5%	M$	1,464	1,036
IRR	%	27	22
Payback period	Production years	2.8	3.7
Case B ($1,400/ounce Au, $6.00/pound Sb, $23.50/ounce Ag) - Base Case
NPV0%	M$	3,580	2,557
NPV5%	M$	2,136	1,482
IRR	%	34	27
Payback period	Production years	2.3	3.0
Case C ($1,600/ounce Au, $6.50/pound Sb, $27.00/ounce Ag)
NPV0%	M$	4,611	3,233
NPV5%	M$	2,808	1,923
IRR	%	40	32
Payback period	Production years	1.9	2.6
Case D ($1,800/ounce Au, $7.00/pound Sb, $30.00/ounce Ag)
NPV0%	M$	5,642	3,910
NPV5%	M$	3,480	2,364
IRR	%	46	36
Payback period	Production years	1.7	2.3

The contribution to the project economics, by metal, is about 93% from gold, 7% from antimony, and less than 1% from silver.

Using a discount rate of 5%, the after-tax break-even gold price for the project is $880/ounce gold (63% of the Case B gold price) assuming no contribution from antimony or silver.

Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity analyses were performed using metal prices, mill head grade, CAPEX, and OPEX as variables. The value of each variable was changed plus and minus 20% independently while all other variables were held constant. The results of the sensitivity analyses are shown in Table 13 below.

Table 13: Sensitivity Analysis - All Cases, Golden Meadows PEA

Case	Variable	After-tax NPV5% (M$)
		-20% Variance	0% Variance	20% Variance
Case A	CAPEX	1,176	1,036	889
	OPEX	1,242	1,036	816
	Metal Price or Grade	436	1,036	1,593
Case B (Base Case)	CAPEX	1,619	1,482	1,344
	OPEX	1,683	1,482	1,277
	Metal Price or Grade	828	1,482	2,122
Case C	CAPEX	2,060	1,923	1,786
	OPEX	2,124	1,923	1,721
	Metal Price or Grade	1,193	1,923	2,652
Case D	CAPEX	2,501	2,364	2,227
	OPEX	2,565	2,364	2,163
	Metal Price or Grade	1,547	2,364	3,181

Economic Impacts

The economic analysis set out in the PEA also provides some indications of the potential economic impact of the Golden Meadows Project on the local, Idaho and US economies, should the future work and permitting support development of a mining operation. Highlights include:

Direct employment of more than 400 people during the three-year construction phase and 425 people during the subsequent 14.2 year operating phase at annual salaries estimated to average more than double the average 2010 census reported salaries for Idaho;

A study by the University of Idaho estimates 2.5 times as many community-based jobs are likely to be dependent on each direct job at such a mine, with such jobs related to contracting, transportation, services and other support activities;

An average annual payroll of $20 million during the conceptual 14.2 year life of mine;

Gross investment of approximately over $500 million in capital equipment and equipment manufacturing during the construction phase, with an additional $200 million or more during operations, the substantial majority of which is expected to be sourced from within the United States; and,

Approximately $1,023 million in direct taxes to all levels of government, including payments to the local county ($3 million), State ($220 million) and Federal ($800 million) governments over the 14.2 year operating life of the project, but excluding payroll taxes, state sales taxes and income taxes paid by employees.

MGI is already having a significant impact on the local economy, with upwards of 115 people directly employed or working with contractors on site in 2011 and 146 so far in 2012, making MGI the largest private sector employer in Valley County, more than 70% of whom reside in the State of Idaho and almost half are from Valley and adjacent Adams counties. MGI has also been able to utilize a significant number of contractors and suppliers from within Valley and Adams counties and the State of Idaho, with an estimated 85% of its project expenditures being spent in Idaho, approximately half of which is being spent with local entities.

Environmental

Midas Gold and MGI recognize the importance of protecting the environment and, to facilitate the development of a sustainable project, Midas Gold established the following environmental objectives for the Project:

Protect surface and ground water quality;

Protect and enhance the fishery;

Maintain or enhance the objectives of CERCLA-ordered environmental improvements;

Minimize potential for sedimentation and spills along transportation corridors; and

Incorporate environmental enhancement opportunities into the conceptual concurrent and final reclamation plans.

In order to achieve Midas Gold’s and MGI’s objectives, SRK has incorporated the following design considerations, from an environmental perspective, into the recommended Project:

Minimize the project footprint - the concepts of backfilling pits, where practical, and concentrating tailings storage in one location (rather than multiple smaller locations) are high priorities for design. Minimizing the footprint enables better protection of water quality and simpler, more effective water management.

Management of water - a comprehensive water management strategy to minimize and reuse water supplies in order to support in-stream flow requirements for important fish species has been developed for additional study as part of this PEA.

Management of waste - the waste management plan for the project involves the potential for segregation and selective handling and placement of potentially reactive waste rock, and storage of flotation, oxide, and POX tailings in a synthetically lined facility. Further, blending of the plus 90% by volume, inert flotation material with the small volume POX tailings, is expected to chemically neutralize any residues in the POX tailings.

Reduce contact of Project infrastructure (including roads in particular) with waterways - The conceptual design presented in this PEA of an alternate road corridor to the Project site would move the main transportation route away from much of the environmentally sensitive Johnson Creek & South Fork of the Salmon River (“SFSR”) waterways.

Enhance the fishery - The environmental design also involves the creation of three fish spawning reaches in the East Fork of the SFSR (“EFSFSR”) above the planned Yellow Pine pit, backfilling of the Yellow Pine pit, and construction of a new channel through the backfilled area that would provide fish passage into the upper reaches of the EFSFSR and Meadow Creek drainage areas that are currently inaccessible due to the steep gradient within the abandoned Yellow Pine pit.

Clean up past environmental degradation - Selective environmental clean-up projects would be considered as part of the overall mine plan, where feasible; additional reclamation treatments at the historic spent ore disposal area (“SODA”) is an example of this opportunity.

Management of air quality - The use of the best practice control technology and practices to control air emissions at the site would be employed.

Environmental Monitoring - Monitoring to ensure compliance with all applicable air, water, waste, and reclamation objectives and to validate the effectiveness of water treatment and best management practice (BMP) technologies is a fundamental component of the Project.

Closure and Remediation

The conceptual closure plan is focused on effective remediation of a considerable area degraded by historic mining practices (including waste dumps, abandoned pits, leach pads, former mill and smelter location, etc.) by re-mining areas of past disturbance, creating substantially improved containment, and managing waste materials in fully engineered and contained facilities. The conceptual closure plan would create more than 60 hectares of new wetlands, restore local drainages, reopen fish pathways along the EFSFSR south of the current Yellow Pine pit lake to migratory species (including salmon), and create three fisheries enhancement habitats. In addition, all newly generated waste would be covered and planted to create sustainable vegetative cover.

Recognizing that there is already substantial disturbance from extensive past open pit and underground mining within its Golden Meadows project boundaries, over the past several years Midas Gold has undertaken a series of voluntary remediation efforts to mitigate the on-going impact of legacy environmental disturbance, including reclaiming more than five acres of ground disturbed prior to Midas Gold’s involvement in the area, planting 5,000 trees in 2011 (with a further 7,800 scheduled for planting in the fall of 2012) to reduce suspended solids run-off, application of dust suppression materials to almost seven miles of public roads, and replaced or repaired numerous culverts and other stream crossings, all of which has helped to reduce the sediment loading of local drainages, enhancing the downstream water quality and fish habitat.

Permitting

Midas Gold has developed an integrated plan to address the potential Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) and the potential regulatory process for any new mining operation, should such be warranted after the additional recommended work and further studies are completed. The plan considers: (a) environmental baseline study needs, (b) MGI’s ultimate “preferred alternative” to be described in the PFS, (c) a concurrent EIS and permitting schedule, (d) environmental risk management strategy, including “offsets” to potential impacts, and (e) an internal management program driven by scheduling milestones and cost tracking.

Substantial existing environmental baseline information generated by previous operators and governmental agencies is being confirmed and supplemented by MGI. This baseline is a compilation of previous studies and several EIS conducted for recent mining operations, remedial cleanup investigations, and multiple resource agency inventories. The new supplemental studies by MGI are aimed at describing ‘current mining’ environmental conditions at the site.

Project Risks & Opportunities

Aside from the risks typical of all large scale mining projects, such as confidence in mineral resource estimates, metallurgical performance, capital and operating cost increases, commodity price decreases, etc., the principal Project risks identified in the PEA include the following:

Ability to acquire a mining permit while maintaining an reasonable development timeline;

Success in converting Inferred resources to Measured or Indicated categories; and

The ability to attract and retain experienced professionals given the competitive state of the global mining industry.

Excluding the typical opportunities for such a mining project as that conceptualized in the PEA, such as higher metal prices, lower costs, etc., a number of specific opportunities have been identified at Golden Meadows and include the following:

Increases in mineral resources - all of the three deposits that contributed mineral resources to the conceptual plan laid out in the PEA are open to expansion and drilling is continuing. Additional mineral resources could extend the mine life, increasing the Project NPV and IRR.

Higher grade mineral resources - if MGI was successful in defining higher grade mineral resource within or around the existing deposits, or in completely new deposits, these mineral resources could displace lower grade material into the future, increasing the Project NPV and IRR.

Increased by-products - as noted in the mineral resource section above, antimony and silver grades have only been estimated for a small portion (approximately 17%) of the overall mineral resource. As additional drilling and modelling is completed, were by-product values extended into the un-estimated areas, higher by-product production could be contemplated and could result in reduced net operating costs, increasing the Project NPV and IRR.

Conversion of in-pit unclassified material - the currently contemplated pits have significant volumes of material with little to no drilling that are therefore unclassified tonnes treated as waste in the current financial model. Drilling has been on-going in 2012, and is continuing, with the objective of converting some portion of these unclassified tonnes to mineral resources above contemplated cut-off grades, which would result in increased mineral resources and mine life, positively affecting the NPV and IRR of the Project.

Improved geotechnical parameters - the currently contemplated pits have slopes assigned to them based on limited geotechnical information. Geotechnical drilling is currently in process to assist with better defining the appropriate geotechnical parameters, which could result in steeper pit walls, reducing strip ratios and therefore lowering operating costs.

Potential increases in design throughput - such increases could result in an improved capital return scenario.

Alternate oxide material processing options - such options could allow earlier or parallel processing of oxide materials, increasing production and economic returns.

Generation of quicklime – generation of quicklime from local limestone sources could reduce costs and the number of vehicles required to bring materials to site.

Moving Forward

MGI intends to use the recommendations in the PEA as the basis for informed discussions with tribal and other governments, NGOs, regulatory agencies, recreational groups, local communities and others in order to cooperatively develop a Project that is sustainable both from an economic and environmental perspective.

MGI did not wait for completion of the PEA to initiate activities it knew would be required to advance the Project towards completion of a PFS and design of a project that may subsequently warrant the filing of permit applications. MGI has already completed approximately 38,246m of in-fill and step-out drilling in 2012 in and around the mineral resources summarized herein with the objective of (a) upgrading the confidence in the existing Inferred mineral resources and better defining potential by-product values, (b) testing currently unclassified material within the current pit limits for its potential to host mineralization, (c) testing for possible extensions to the existing mineral deposits, (d) geotechnical drilling, and (e) commencing the testing for other potential deposits, such as Scout. In addition, MGI has begun collecting additional metallurgical samples for further testing, is continuing its geotechnical and baseline environmental assessments, is assessing potential local sources of limestone, and is continuing with other Project related activities.

All of the new 2012 drilling is to be incorporated in a new mineral resource estimate scheduled for completion in Q1/13, while all other information, including possible 2013 drilling, is to be incorporated into future studies (whether an updated PEA or a PFS) and to provide sufficient detail and confidence to contemplate the filing of permit applications, should the Project economics warrant once this additional information has been collected and incorporated into such studies.

Illustrations

To view the conceptual project layout and closure, please click here.

Updated Technical Report

Midas Gold plans to file a NI 43-101 Technical Report on SEDAR by mid-September detailing the information set out herein.


Compliance with National Instrument 43-101

Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Mineral resource estimates do not account for mineability, selectivity, mining loss and dilution. These mineral resource estimates include inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is also no certainty that these Inferred mineral resources will be converted to the Measured and Indicated categories through further drilling, or into mineral reserves, once economic considerations are applied.

The mineral resources at Golden Meadows are contained within areas that have seen historic disturbance resulting from prior mining activities. In order for MGI to advance its interests at Golden Meadows, the Project will be subject to a number of Federal, State and local laws and regulations and will require permit to conduct its activities. However, MGI is not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal or other reasons that would prevent it from advancing the project.

For readers to fully understand the information in this news release, they should read the Technical Report (to be available on SEDAR or at www.midasgoldinc.com by mid-September 2012) in its entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions and exclusions that relate to the information set out in this news release which qualifies the Technical Information. The Technical Report intended to be read as a whole, and sections should not be read or relied upon out of context. The technical information in that report is subject to the assumptions and qualifications contained in the Technical Report.

Non-IFRS Performance Measure

“Cash Operating Costs” is a non-IFRS Performance Measure. This performance measure is included because this statistic is a key performance measure that management uses to monitor performance. This performance measure does not have a meaning within IFRS and, therefore, amounts presented may not be comparable to similar data presented by other mining companies. This performance measure should not be considered in isolation as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with IFRS.

Conference Call & Webcast Details

Midas Gold will be hosting a conference call and webcast at 7:00 AM PT on Wednesday September 5, 2012 to discuss highlights of the PEA on the Golden Meadows Project and to provide analysts and investors the opportunity to ask questions; call in details are as follows:

Canada & USA Toll Free Dial In: 1-800-319-4610
Outside of Canada & USA call: +1-604-638-5340

International local numbers are available at: http://services.choruscall.com/links/itfsa.html. Callers should dial in 5 - 10 min prior to the scheduled start time and simply ask to join the Midas Gold call.

Midas Gold will also webcast the presentation to accompany the discussion; simply click on the following link to access the presentation: http://services.choruscall.com/links/midas20120905.html.

The conference call will be available for replay by calling Canada & USA Toll Free 1-800-319-6413 or Outside Canada & USA Call: +1-604-638-9010. Alternatively, international local numbers are available at: http://services.choruscall.com/links/itfsa.html and enter the code 8230 followed by the # sign. The call will be available for one month.

Quality Assurance

The technical information in this news release has been approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The resource estimation for the gold deposits at Golden Meadows was completed by David Rowe, C.P.G of SRK under the supervision of Guy Dishaw, P. Geo, of SRK. The other QPs responsible for the PEA study are set out below.

• Gordon Doerksen, P.Eng., JDS Energy and Mining Inc. (overall project management and economic analysis);

• Dino Pilotto, P.Eng., SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (mining);

• Bruce Murphy, FSAIMM, SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (mine geotech);

• Maritz Rykaart, P.Eng., SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (waste management)

• John Duncan, P.Eng. SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. (water management);

• Chris Martin, C.Eng., Blue Coast Metallurgy Ltd. (metallurgy);

• Kevin Scott, P.Eng., Ausenco Solutions Canada Inc. (infrastructure and mineral processing); and

• Rick Richins, BS, MS, RTR Inc. (environmental considerations).

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project
Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” “confirm” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, “contemplates”, “recommends” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, certain assumptions as to production rate, operating cost, recovery and metal costs as set out in this news release, that any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms; the exchange rates for the U.S. and Canadian currencies in 2012 will be consistent with the Corporation’s expectations; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table 4: Conceptual Life-of-mine Open Pit Production Schedule, Golden Meadows Project, Idaho

Description	Unit	Total	Year
			-1*	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
Yellow Pine mineralized material mined	Mt	47.2	2.5	2.6	7.3	5.4	4.8	4.6	6.9	7.3	5.9	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hangar Flats mineralized material mined	Mt	20.5	-	-	-	2.0	2.5	2.7	0.4	-	1.6	-	-	-	0.7	2.1	7.3	1.3
West End mineralized material mined	Mt	33.6	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7.1	7.3	7.3	6.6	5.2	-	-
Total	Mt	101.3	2.5	2.6	7.3	7.4	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.5	7.1	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.3	1.3
Overall Mill Head Grade	Au g/t	1.72	1.93	1.94	2.09	1.93	1.95	1.79	1.99	1.84	2.07	1.23	1.34	1.24	1.45	1.77	1.48	1.96
Overall Waste Tonnes	Mt	371.7	14.4	12.3	25.1	29.6	28.9	27.6	28.8	23.6	32.6	27.5	25.6	31.2	21.3	23.0	19.8	0.5
Overall Strip Ratio waste t:mineralized t	t:t	3.7	5.8	4.7	3.4	4.0	4.0	3.8	3.9	3.3	4.3	3.9	3.5	4.3	2.9	3.2	2.7	0.4

* Material mined in Year -1 is processed in Year 1

Table 9: Annual Plant Feed, Recovery and Cash Cost Estimates, PEA for Golden Meadows Project, Idaho

Description	Unit	Total	Year
			1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15
Total Plant feed	(Mt)	101.3	5.1	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.5	7.1	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.3	7.3	1.3
Gold grade	(g/t)	1.72	1.94	2.09	1.93	1.95	1.79	1.99	1.84	2.07	1.23	1.34	1.24	1.45	1.77	1.48	1.96
Silver grade	(g/t)	1.60	7.21	3.34	2.65	2.26	1.72	2.63	2.19	1.03	-	-	-	-	0.18	0.48	3.86
Antimony grade (for +0.1% Sb material)	(%)	0.45	0.60	0.36	0.46	0.38	0.36	0.41	0.53	0.31	-	-	-	0.29	0.55	0.51	0.84
Gold Recovery	(%)	89.0	87.4	88.8	88.9	89.6	89.9	90.7	90.4	90.6	79.6	91.3	84.6	88.7	90.3	89.9	89.6
Silver Recovery	(%)	13.0	16.1	15.0	15.6	12.5	10.2	8.5	11.0	7.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	14.2	15.0	10.2
Antimony Recovery (for +0.1% Sb material)	(%)	80.0	80.0	80.0	80.0	80.0	80.0	80.0	80.0	80.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	80.0	80.0	80.0	80.0
Payable Gold	Koz	4,922	272	425	399	403	372	419	383	447	222	284	244	300	371	308	72
Payable Silver	Koz	335	102	46	40	28	21	39	30	14	-	-	-	-	2	5	8
Payable Antimony	Mlb	90.6	20.8	15.3	14.1	10.9	4.5	3.5	7.5	2.5	-	-	-	-	1.6	5.8	3.9
Cash Cost (without by-product credit)	$/payable oz Au	532	484	450	489	482	523	468	498	452	818	656	712	580	504	590	540
Cash Cost (with by-product credit)	$/payable oz Au	425	35	239	283	325	453	417	382	419	818	656	712	578	479	481	225

MIDAS GOLD CONFIRMS SCOUT AS A MAJOR NEW ANTIMONY-GOLD SYSTEM AT ITS GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT, IDAHO

Hole MGI-12-249 intersects 1.85% Sb and 0.77 g/t Au over 183.3m
Including: 13.9m grading 1.77 g/t Au, 2.96% Sb; and 23.8m grading 1.04 g/t Au, 2.69% Sb

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced assay results from three exploration holes drilled at the Scout Prospect on its Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow Pine District, Idaho. These new results are from follow-up holes drilled after Midas Gold’s winter reverse circulation (“RC”) drilling program successfully cut thick intervals of gold-silver-antimony mineralization, as reported in a news release dated April 25, 2012. These results, which include significant gold and antimony intercepts, not only confirm historic drill results but also extend the known mineralized area approximately 150 metres to the south of the prior RC holes, demonstrating the presence of a major gold-antimony mineralizing system at Scout. Highlights of significant assay results from these new drill holes are summarized in Table 1, below, while more detailed results are in Table 2 at the end of this release.

Table 1: Highlights of Recent Drill Results from the Scout Prospect

Hole ID	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)
MGI-12-238	93.6	240.5	146.9(1)	0.86	4.5	0.46
Including	203.0	227.7	24.7	1.46	5.0	0.64
MGI-12-244	93.1	134.7	41.6	2.14	5.3	0.45
MGI-12-249(2)	48.3	58.8	10.5	0.71	2.9	0.14
And	79.6	262.9	183.3(1)	0.77	13.1	1.85
Including	79.6	141.7	62.2	1.16	12.1	1.15
And	149.7	169.6	20.0	0.35	15.5	2.13
And	211.4	225.3	13.9	1.77	5.9	2.96
And	239.1	262.9	23.8	1.04	14.6	2.69

“The results of our recent drilling at Scout clearly demonstrate the presence of a major new gold-silver-antimony system at our Golden Meadows Project. These most recent results confirmed mineralization reported in nearby historic drill holes by intersecting significant thicknesses of gold-silver-antimony mineralization where predicted and, in addition, at depths below those previously tested by past operators,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “The considerable thicknesses of high grade antimony mineralization, with significant associated gold and silver values, intercepted in the most recent holes, suggests potential to define a major new gold-silver antimony mineral resource in this area.” More drilling is planned in the coming months to evaluate the extent and tenor of this system as it remains wide open to expansion along strike, to depth and toward surface. “Scout is the first of more than a dozen high priority exploration targets identified by Midas Gold on its Gold Meadows Project to be drill tested, and drilling of more of these targets is planned for later in 2012 and into 2013,” said Mr. Quin.

2012 Drill Program
To the end of July, Midas Gold has completed a total of 32,166 meters in 120 holes during its 2012 drill campaign, with between six and nine core and RC rigs operating on the property at various times through the season. Drilling with six core rigs is currently focused on continued in-fill and step-out drilling at the West End and Yellow Pine deposits with a view to upgrading the confidence levels of prior mineral resource estimates as well as testing unclassified material within the resource-limiting pits used to constrain the mineral resource estimates that are currently treated as waste but may, in some locations, be mineralized. In addition, core drilling to collect metallurgical samples, hydrological drilling (with a seventh, sonic rig), baseline environmental programs and other activities are proceeding with the objective of supporting completion of a pre-feasibility study (“PFS”) in 2013 and, subsequently, commencing the permitting of a mining operation, if supported by the PFS. Exploration focused on new targets and prospects within the Golden Meadows property will occur intermittently throughout the summer and fall of 2012 with the objective of discovering additional mineral deposits as has been successfully achieved at Scout. In parallel with these activities, work is proceeding on preparation of a preliminary economic assessment, due for completion in Q3/12, and components of the PFS.

Scout Prospect Description & History
The Scout Prospect is situated approximately 1.25km northeast of the Hangar Flats deposit, along a north-south fault system that hosts widespread gold-silver and antimony mineralization that can be traced along strike for approximately 650m in widely spaced drill holes. This fault system, all of which may not be mineralized, can be inferred to be present for several km to the north-northwest, based on Midas Gold’s 2011 airborne magnetics and EM surveys. Scattered soil anomalies and geologic mapping along this fault shows that it lies approximately 1km to the east of, and parallel to, the Meadow Creek fault system, which controls the Hangar Flats and Yellow Pine gold-silver-antimony-tungsten deposits.

The Scout Prospect was first discovered in the 1940s, after US Geological Survey and US Bureau of Mines workers conducted experimental biochemical sampling in the district, which outlined a large gold and antimony biogeochemical anomaly. The area that hosts the biochemical anomaly occurs in a distinct, linear, north-south trending topographic depression, interpreted to be a less resistant structural zone, which is marked by strong geophysical anomalies. A series of weak but pronounced soil anomalies occur parallel to this trend, slightly uphill to the east, where the drilled zones would project to the surface but are covered by talus and slope debris. Several small pits and trenches, which were likely excavated during the 1940s during government-sponsored antimony-tungsten exploration, exposed massive, blocky, slightly schistose quartzite containing narrow, gold-bearing, high-grade stibnite veins and altered, sulfide-bearing igneous dikes. Stratigraphic relationships, derived from outcrop mapping and drill data, indicate the valley itself is underlain by calc-silicates and silicified and dolomitized carbonates, similar to those that host the nearby Garnet Prospect. The Garnet prospect lies approximately 0.8km to the east of Scout and was the site of a 1995 open pit mining operation that produced approximately 35,000 ounces of gold from oxidized ores in skarn and calc-silicates that graded approximately 6 g/t gold.

Between 1948 and 1990 three companies explored the Scout area with 20 drill holes, totaling approximately 2,435m of drilling. Six east-west IP geophysical lines (by past operators and Midas Gold) run across the Scout Prospect area and delineate a large resistivity low and numerous IP chargeability anomalies that could be indicative of a much larger sulphide mineralized system than currently defined by drilling.

Mineralization can be traced down dip at least 250m and along strike for several hundreds of meters and occurs within a thick section of fractured, sheared and brecciated quartzites, felsic intrusive rocks, calcareous schists and thin dolomitic marbles impregnated with disseminated pyrite and stockwork veins of stibnite.

About Antimony

Antimony is a metal produced dominantly in China that is primarily used as a flame retardant in the manufacture of a variety of materials and, to a lesser extent, as an alloy with lead in the manufacture of batteries. Recent pricing for antimony was US$12,750 per tonne (or US$5.78 per pound), or about 70% more per pound than copper. The British Geologic Survey identified antimony as one of the metals with the highest supply risk in a recent survey, while the European Commission placed antimony on the list of fourteen raw materials on a list of critical concerns for the European Union in the face of serious potential supply shortages. In its 2012 Mineral Commodity Outlook, the US Geologic Survey noted that, ‘In China, the world’s leading antimony producer, the Government continued to shut down antimony mines and smelters in an effort to control environmental issues and resolve safety problems. The local Government in Lengshuijiang, Hunan Province, which accounts for about 60% of the world antimony supply, shuttered almost all of its mines and smelters. Also, officials in Lengshuijiang announced that after more than 110 years of continuous mining, the area now had only 5 years of mining life left.”

Illustrations
To view illustrations, please click here.

Quality Assurance
The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The exploration activities at Golden Meadows were carried out under the supervision of Christopher Dail, C.P.G., Qualified Person and Exploration Manager for the Golden Meadows Project.

All gold assays are by a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by an atomic absorption finish (with a 0.005g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 6g/t are re-analyzed using a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. Silver is analyzed via a 4-acid digestion followed by an ICP finish (with a 0.5g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 10g/t Ag are reanalyzed using a 2g ICP-AES, four acid digest, while samples reporting > 750g/t Ag are reanalyzed using a 30g Fire Assay charge followed by a gravimetric finish. Antimony is analyzed via a 4-acid digestion followed by an ICP finish (with a 5.0g/t lower reporting limit). Samples reporting values > 2,000g/t Sb are reanalyzed using XRF with a 0.9g charge in a Lithium Borate fusion (with a 0.01% lower reporting limit).

All gold composites utilize a 0.3g/t cut off and may include internal waste. Some intervals may not add or subtract correctly due to rounding, but are deemed insignificant. Analyses are carried out by ALS CHEMEX in their Reno and Winnemucca, Nevada and Vancouver, British Columbia laboratories. Blank and standard samples are used for quality assurance and quality control and a review of the results of analyses of the blanks, standards and duplicates by the Corporation’s Qualified Person indicates values are within normal and acceptable ranges.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were reported for all three deposits in a news release dated April 20, 2011 and are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resources, Golden Meadows Project, Valley County, Idaho” dated June 6, 2011 (the “Technical Report”) and updated on June 12, 2012 is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “suggests”, “potential”, “confirm” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms; the exchange rates for the U.S. and Canadian currencies in 2012 will be consistent with the Corporation’s expectations; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table 2: Table of Scout Drill Results
(To accompany Midas Gold news release dated August 2, 2012)

Hole ID	Hole Type	Bearing	Inclination	Total Depth (m)	From (m)	To (m)	Interval (m)	Gold (g/t)	Silver (g/t)	Antimony (%)
MGI-12-238	Core	077	-66	267.2	93.6	240.5	146.9(1)	0.86	4.5	0.46
Including					93.6	130.5	36.9	1.20	6.0	0. 54
And					152.1	178.3	26.2	1.14	2.1	0.10
And					203.0	227.7	24.7	1.46	5.0	0.64
MGI-12-244	Core	077	-45	212.1	22.0	25.9	4.0	0.53	0.6	0.01
Including					37.8	55.5	17.7	0.43	0.7	0.05
And					93.1	134.7	41.6	2.14	5.3	0.45
And					148.6	170.4	21.8	0.33	0.3	0.08
MGI-12-249(2)	Core	115	-53	278.9	48.3	58.8	10.5	0.71	2.9	0.14
And					79.6	262.9	183.3(1)	0.77	13.1	1.85
Including					79.6	141.7	62.2	1.16	12.1	1.15
And					149.7	169.6	20.0	0.35	15.5	2.13
And					211.4	225.3	13.9	1.77	5.9	2.96
And					239.1	262.9	23.8	1.04	14.6	2.69

(1) These broader intervals of antimony mineralization are composited on the basis of the overall zone of antimony mineralization, whereas the sub-intervals are estimated on the basis of gold cut-offs as detailed in the QA/QC section below, which zones lie within but are not identical to the antimony zones. In some cases, the antimony composite has been expanded to encompass all of an overlapping gold composite to simplify reporting.
(2) Based upon the current 3D interpretation of the Scout prospect, the intervals quoted here are at or near true thickness. For intervals in hole MGI-12-249, true thickness is approximately 90% of reported interval.

MIDAS GOLD CONFIRMS NO MATERIAL CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) confirms that as of the date of this news release, there are no material corporate developments and the Company is not aware of any material undisclosed developments that would cause the recent movements in the Company’s share price.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite‐Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resources, Golden Meadows Project, Valley County, Idaho” dated June 6, 2011 (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. A new technical report covering all three updated mineral resources will be filed on SEDAR in conjunction with the completion of a preliminary economic assessment, scheduled for completion in Q3/12.

MIDAS GOLD COMPLETES MINERAL RESOURCE UPDATE WITH A DOUBLING OF GOLD IN INDICATED CATEGORY

Overall Contained Gold at Golden Meadows increases 22%; First Antimony & Silver Estimates

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) today announced the last of three planned independent NI43-101 mineral resource estimates for its Golden Meadows Project in Idaho, completing the process of updating its mineral resource estimates to incorporate second half of 2011 and early 2012 drill results. These updated estimates resulted in an overall 22% increase in contained gold at Golden Meadows in just six months of drilling. Including the previously announced updates for the West End and Yellow Pine deposits, gold contained in indicated mineral resources has increased 103% (to 4.23 million oz at a grade of 1.68 g/t gold) from the June 2011 estimate. A total of 59% of the contained gold at Golden Meadows is now in the indicated category, while 41% (2.89 million oz at a grade of 1.60g/t gold) is in the inferred category. Furthermore, antimony and silver have been added to the Yellow Pine and Hangar Flats mineral resource estimates, with 108.5 million pounds of contained antimony in the indicated category and an additional 92.8 million pounds of contained antimony inferred within the overall mineral resource. While each element is reported below for each of the three deposits, as constrained in the base case Whittle(r) pits, higher grade antimony and silver subdomains are also reported separately within 0.1% antimony shells, as detailed on the following page, which subdomains host all of the modeled antimony and have an average grade of 0.49% antimony. Antimony was not modeled outside the 0.1% antimony shell.

Mineral Resource Estimate(1) - All Three Deposits comprising the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho
Prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., June 25, 2012

Mineral Resource Category	Tonnes (000s)	Gold Grade (g/t)	Contained Gold (000s oz)	Silver Grade(5) (g/t)	Contained Silver (000s oz)	Antimony Grade(4)(5) (%)	Contained Antimony (000s lbs)
Open Pit Oxide(2) Mineral Resources
Indicated	10,573	0.90	305	0.00	-	0.00%	122
Inferred	2,201	0.97	68	0.00	-	0.00%	178
Open Pit Sulphide(3) Mineral Resources
Indicated	67,653	1.80	3,925	0.60	1,312	0.07%	108,385
Inferred	53,917	1.63	2,822	0.93	1,603	0.08%	92,606
Total Open Pit Oxide + Sulphide(2)(3) Mineral Resources
Indicated	78,226	1.68	4,229	0.52	1,312	0.06%	108,507
Inferred	56,117	1.60	2,890	0.89	1,603	0.07%	92,784

(1) Mineral resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability - see “Compliance with NI43-101” below. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. All composites have been capped where appropriate.
(2) Open pit oxide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.42 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details below).
(3) Open pit sulfide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.75 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details below).
(4) Where antimony grades are shown as “0.00” there is antimony present but it rounds to 0.00.
(5) Antimony and silver were not estimated for the West End deposit due to a lack of sufficient assays, and is averaged into the totals at an assumed zero grade.

Antimony Subdomains(1) Mineral Resource, Yellow Pine & Hangar Flats Deposits, Golden Meadows Project, Idaho
Prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., June 25, 2012

Mineral Resource Category	Tonnes (000s)	Gold Grade (g/t)	Contained Gold (000s oz)	Silver Grade (g/t)	Contained Silver (000s oz)	Antimony Grade (%)	Contained Antimony (000s lbs)
Open Pit Sulphide(2) Mineral Resources
Indicated	9,999	2.31	743	3.15	1,012	0.49%	108,507
Inferred	8,639	2.08	576	5.04	1,400	0.49%	92,784

(1) Mineral resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability - see “Compliance with NI43-101” below. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. All composites have been capped where appropriate.

(2) Open pit sulfide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.75 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details below). The antimony subdomain is further limited to discrete zones of mineralization with grades that exceed 0.1% Sb.

“The updated mineral resource for the three deposits within our Golden Meadows Project demonstrates excellent progress over the past year,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “While the indicated gold mineral resource has more than doubled, we have also added significant value to the project by including antimony as a potential by-product and increased the overall contained gold by 22%, with significant gains at West End and Yellow Pine, partially offset by reductions at Hangar Flats. The addition of an antimony resource will become more important as we move into our economic studies, since the higher grade antimony mineralization is concentrated near surface and can be extracted early in a mine plan,” he said. “Furthermore, we have improved the confidence in our resource models as Midas Gold’s drill data provides better control on the mineralization and replaces a significant amount of historic data. Step out drilling, completed subsequent to the resource cut-off date, continues to intersect significant new mineralization outside of our current mineral resource at Yellow Pine and Hangar Flats, while drilling has recently commenced shortly at the West End deposit, which remains open to expansion in several directions.”

Hangar Flats Mineral Resource Update

The base case mineral resource estimate for the Hangar Flats deposit was prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. and is summarized herein. Sensitivity according to gold cut-off grade is summarized below. The economically driven pit shell that limits the mineral resource was based entirely on gold value, with antimony and silver reporting within the resource-limiting pit but not defining it. Within the resource-limiting pit, antimony and silver grades are reported without any cut-off. Any mineralization lying outside the resource-limiting pit is not reported as mineral resources.

Since the date of this mineral resource estimate, additional drilling has been completed at Hangar Flats, and is continuing, that is extending the mineralization to the west and east beside and below the mineral resources reported herein, while Midas Gold plans to test possible extensions to the south of the current mineral resource later in 2012, subject to permitting, in areas where prior drilling has indicated potential for extensions to mineralization and is supported by airborne EM geophysical anomalies.

Mineral Resource Statement (1), Hangar Flats Deposit, Golden Meadows Project, Idaho
Prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., June 25, 2012

Mineral Resource Category	Tonnes (000s)	Gold Grade (g/t)	Contained Gold (000s oz)	Silver Grade (g/t)	Contained Silver (000s oz)	Antimony Grade (%)	Contained Antimony (000s lbs)
Open Pit Oxide(2) Mineral Resources
Indicated	750	0.73	18	-	-	-	-
Inferred	589	0.82	15	-	-	-	-
Open Pit Sulphide(3) Mineral Resources
Indicated	16,440	1.73	914	1.37	725	0.12	44,217
Inferred	7,828	1.50	378	0.09	22	0.02	3,106
Total Open Pit Oxide + Sulphide(2)(3) Mineral Resources
Indicated	17,189	1.69	932	1.31	725	0.12	44,217
Inferred	8,416	1.45	393	0.08	22	0.02	3,106

(1) Mineral resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability - see “Compliance with NI43-101” below. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. All composites have been capped where appropriate.

(2) Open pit oxide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.42 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details below).

(3) Open pit sulfide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.75 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details below).

Higher Grade Antimony Area at Hangar Flats

As noted above, within the larger envelope of gold mineralization, there are zones significantly enriched in antimony and silver relative to the overall mineral resource. These zones, defined by a plus 0.1% antimony shell, lie entirely within the pit-limited mineral resource and are reported separately below to illustrate the higher grades of antimony and silver within the overall mineral resource.

Mineral Resource Antimony Subdomain(1), Hangar Flats Deposit, Golden Meadows Project, Idaho
Prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., June 13, 2012

Mineral Resource Category	Tonnes (000s)	Gold Grade (g/t)	Contained Gold (000s oz)	Silver Grade (g/t)	Contained Silver (000s oz)	Antimony Grade (%)	Contained Antimony (000s lbs)
Open Pit Sulphide(2) Mineral Resources
Indicated	3,475	2.16	242	4.31	482	0.58	44,217
Inferred	339	1.33	14	0.91	10	0.42	3,106

(1) Mineral resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability - see “Compliance with NI43-101” below. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. All composites have been capped where appropriate.

(2) Open pit sulfide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.75 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details below). The antimony subdomain is further limited to discrete zones of mineralization with grades that exceed 0.1% Sb.

Hangar Flats Mineral Resource Estimate at different Cut-off Grades

The sensitivity of the Hangar Flats deposit mineral resource estimate to different cut-off grades is tabulated below.

Sensitivity of Mineral Resource Statement (1) for the Hangar Flats Deposit to Cut-off Grade

Category (Base case highlighted)	Cut-off Grade (g/t Gold)	Tonnes (000s)	Gold Grade (g/t)	Contained Gold (000s oz)	Silver Grade (g/t)	Contained Silver (000s oz)	Antimony Grade (%)	Contained Antimony (000s lbs)
Oxide Indicated	0.65	363	0.97	11	0.00	0	0.00	0
	0.55	491	0.87	14	0.00	0	0.00	0
	0.42	750	0.73	18	0.00	0	0.00	0
	0.35	926	0.67	20	0.00	0	0.00	0
	0.25	1,201	0.58	22	0.00	0	0.00	0
Sulphide Indicated	0.95	13,962	1.89	846	1.55	694	0.14	41,555
	0.85	15,233	1.80	883	1.44	703	0.13	42,314
	0.75	16,440	1.73	914	1.37	725	0.12	44,217
	0.65	17,829	1.65	945	1.29	737	0.11	44,810
	0.55	19,241	1.57	972	1.20	740	0.11	44,965
Oxide Inferred	0.65	286	1.09	10	0.00	0	0.00	0
	0.55	462	0.91	13	0.00	0	0.00	0
	0.42	589	0.82	15	0.00	0	0.00	0
	0.35	685	0.75	17	0.00	0	0.00	0
	0.25	942	0.63	19	0.00	0	0.00	0
Sulphide Inferred	0.95	5,698	1.75	320	0.12	21	0.02	2,638
	0.85	6,717	1.62	350	0.10	22	0.02	2,814
	0.75	7,828	1.50	378	0.09	22	0.02	3,106
	0.65	9,125	1.39	407	0.08	23	0.02	3,420
	0.55	10,318	1.30	430	0.08	25	0.02	3,412
Total Indicated	0.65 Oxide, 0.95 Sulphide	14,325	1.86	857	1.51	694	0.13	41,555
	0.55 Oxide, 0.85 Sulphide	15,723	1.77	897	1.39	703	0.12	42,314
	0.42 Oxide, 0.75 Sulphide	17,189	1.69	932	1.31	725	0.12	44,217
	0.35 Oxide, 0.65 Sulphide	18,755	1.60	965	1.22	737	0.11	44,810
	0.25 Oxide, 0.55 Sulphide	20,442	1.51	994	1.13	740	0.10	44,965
Total Inferred	0.65 Oxide, 0.95 Sulphide	5,984	1.72	330	0.11	21	0.02	2,638
	0.55 Oxide, 0.85 Sulphide	7,179	1.57	363	0.09	22	0.02	2,814
	0.42 Oxide, 0.75 Sulphide	8,416	1.45	393	0.08	22	0.02	3,106
	0.35 Oxide, 0.65 Sulphide	9,811	1.34	424	0.07	23	0.02	3,420
	0.25 Oxide, 0.55 Sulphide	11,260	1.24	449	0.07	25	0.01	3,412

(1) Mineral resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability - see “Compliance with NI43-101” below. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. All composites have been capped where appropriate.

(2) Open pit oxide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.42 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details below).

(3) Open pit sulfide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.75 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details below).

(4) Where antimony grades are shown as “0.00” there is antimony present but it rounds to 0.00.

Hangar Flats Mineral Resource Estimation

Mineral resource estimates for Hangar Flats were completed using Gemcom GEMS® software by David Rowe, C.P.G., of SRK Consulting (Canada), Inc. and incorporates the results of 49 holes drilled in 2011 and 2012 that were not utilized in the prior mineral resource estimate.

In reviewing the total drilling database, SRK and Midas Gold have eliminated all underground channel samples and any historic Bradley era holes that were not supported by Midas drilling, which resulted in a drop in total contained ounces of gold, especially from the inferred category. The underground channel samples were deemed inferior to the historic drilling, which holes were primarily drilled in the 1940’s using typical ‘A’ gauge core bits, with sludge and core both assayed. While the channel samples may have identified mineralization, the quality of the samples and the lack of reliable mapping in reference to the samples preclude confident estimation into immediately adjacent areas. Additional drilling would be required to determine whether this data could be used (if verified) or replaced in future mineral resource estimates with new data. The veracity of the remaining historic drilling, which was completed in the 1940s through the 1990s, was confirmed through a rigorous data verification protocol. This included reviewing original drill logs, assay certificates and survey information, comparison of data from different drilling campaigns within the same area, and comparison to the Midas Gold holes. Blocks of 25m and 50m that were well informed (6 samples minimum) by both historic data and recent drilling were compared to validate the older data. Where no bias existed, and where good correlations dominated, the older data was used in grade estimation.

Three dimensional structural domains were constructed based on the orientation of the structural controls for gold deposition, and the gold deposit extents were limited within a gold shell constructed at a 0.25 g/t Au fire assay (“AuFA”) threshold. The gold shell was also limited at the boundaries of the deposit so as not to extend more than 60 meters beyond any mineralized drill hole intercept. Antimony and silver shells were also constructed to drill holes, with 0.1% Sb and 5 g/t Ag cut-offs. Although spatially related, the antimony and silver mineralization is characterized by different structural controls than the gold mineralization.

Original gold, silver, and antimony assay values from drilling were capped, according to cumulative frequency plots of assays within resource limiting shells. Gold capping of individual assays resulted in a loss of 4% total metal. For silver and antimony, capping resulted in metal losses of 10% and 12% respectively. Composite samples were then created at three meter intervals, and were restricted to the limits of the 0.25g/t Au shell.

Ordinary kriging was used to interpolate grades within each of the three structural domains, and the total gold, silver, and antimony block model estimates consisted of two successively larger passes. The first pass used a maximum search radius of 40, 50, and 45 meters for each gold, silver, and antimony respectively, which represents one half (1/2) of the maximum range of the variography, and was subdivided into octants for gold only. The second pass was set to estimate the remaining blocks within the gold shell. Total gold, silver, and antimony assay values were estimated within blocks measuring 15x15x6 meters.

Once the estimation process was completed, the previously mined areas were removed, based on available surveys of the existing underground workings, the limits of which have been locally confirmed by holes drilled through voids and timbers.

Mineral resources are classified in the Indicated category for all blocks estimated by at least four composite samples from a minimum of two drill holes, and a minimum of three octants from the first interpolation pass which searched out to 40 metres or one half (1/2) of the maximum range of sample grade continuity defined by the variography. Final broad areas of indicated blocks were outlined by constructing a classification envelope designed to encompass zones predominantly flagged by the first search pass. This process allows review of the geologic control/confidence on the deposit, and expands certain areas but excludes others from Indicated category. All remaining blocks within the gold shell are classified as Inferred.

Cut-off Grade Selection

The cut-off grade selected for the base case resource-limiting pit was estimated on the basis of gold only, and used the following assumptions:

	June 2012 Estimate	June 2011 Estimate
Gold Price (US$/oz)	$1,400.00	$1,200.00
Refining & transport (US$/oz recovered)	$7.00	$5.00
Mining cost (US$/tonne moved)	$1.50	$1.50
Sulphide processing cost (US$/tonne processed)	$23.00	$20.00
Oxide processing cost (US$/tonne processed)	$10.00	$5.00
G&A cost (US$/tonne processed)	$3.00	$2.00
Sulphide recovery	90%	95%
Oxide recovery	80%	85%
NSR Royalty	0%	5%
Maximum Pit slopes	45 degrees	45 degrees
Discount rate	7%	0%

This led to a calculated cut-off grade of 0.36g/t gold for oxides and 0.65g/t for sulphides. In order to provide a level of conservatism, Midas Gold requested SRK to add a 15% contingency factor, increasing the base case cut-off grades to 0.42g/t gold for oxides and 0.75g/t for sulphides. This cut-off grade and the assumptions above were used by Jim Robertson, P.Eng., of SRK Consulting (Canada), Inc., to float conceptual pits using Whittle(r) that limit the mineral resources so that only mineral resources above these cut-offs and within the resource-limiting pit are reported; mineralization falling outside the resource-limiting pit is not reported, no matter what the grade. The strip ratio for this resource-limiting pit dropped from last year’s 7.31:1 to a current 7.1:1 (tonnes of waste to tonnes of mineral resource within the pit).

It should be noted that the assumptions used to derive the cut-off grades and define the resource-limiting pits are estimated so as to meet the NI43-101 requirement for mineral resource estimates to demonstrate “reasonable prospects for economic extraction” and the cut-off grades to be used in the upcoming preliminary economic assessment may vary from those used to limit the mineral resources reported herein, as the inputs to that study are determined. No inference is implied in the changes to the cut-off grade assumptions from the prior mineral resource estimates as to what will be used in the upcoming preliminary economic assessment, as those assumptions remain to be determined.

Updated Technical Report

The details of all three mineral resource estimates will be provided in a NI43-101 Technical Report to be filed in conjunction with the completion of a preliminary economic assessment due in Q3/12.

Compliance with National Instrument 43-101

David Rowe, CPG, of SRK Consulting (Canada), Inc. is the qualified person, as defined in National Instrument 43-101, responsible for the mineral resource estimates for the Hangar Flats deposit as reported herein. He has read and approved the relevant technical portions of this news release related to the mineral resource estimates for which he is responsible.

Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Mineral resource estimates do not account for mineability, selectivity, mining loss and dilution. These mineral resource estimates include inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves. There is also no certainty that these inferred mineral resources will be converted to the measured and indicated categories through further drilling, or into mineral reserves, once economic considerations are applied.

The mineral resources at Golden Meadows are contained within areas that have seen historic disturbance resulting from prior mining activities. In order for Midas to advance its interests at Golden Meadows, the project will be subject to a number of Federal, State and local laws and regulations and will require permit to conduct its activities. However, Midas is not aware of any environmental, permitting, legal or other reasons that would prevent it from advancing the project.

Illustrations
To view the locations of current drill holes and the old and new pit boundaries for the Hangar Flat deposit, please click here.

Quality Assurance

The technical information in this news release has been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulatory requirements set out in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI43-101”) and reviewed and approved by Stephen P. Quin, P. Geo., President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp., and a Qualified Person. The resource estimation for the gold deposits at Golden Meadows was completed by David Rowe, C.P.G., and Wayne Barnett, Pr.Sci. Nat., of SRK Consulting (Canada), Inc. under the supervision of Guy Dishaw, P. Geo, of SRK Consulting (Canada), Inc., and was reviewed by Paul Jensen, C.P.G., Qualified Person and Midas Gold’s Senior Geologist for the Golden Meadows Project.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow Pine district of central Idaho. The principal gold deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates are detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resources, Golden Meadows Project, Valley County, Idaho” dated June 6, 2011 (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. A new technical report covering all three updated mineral resources will be filed on SEDAR in conjunction with the completion of a preliminary economic assessment, scheduled for completion in Q3/12.

Forward-Looking Statements
Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are “forward-looking information” or “forward-looking statements” (collectively, “Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future exploration activities on the Corporation’s properties; success of exploration activities; permitting time lines and requirements, requirements for additional capital, requirements for additional water rights and the potential effect of proposed notices of environmental conditions relating to mineral claims; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. In certain cases, Forward-Looking Information can be identified by the use of words and phrases such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “potential” “confirm” or “does not anticipate”, “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved”. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that may be encountered if the Golden Meadows Project is developed. In making the forward-looking statements in this news release, the Corporation has applied several material assumptions, including, but not limited to, that any additional financing needed will be available on reasonable terms; the exchange rates for the U.S. and Canadian currencies in 2012 will be consistent with the Corporation’s expectations; that the current exploration and other objectives concerning the Golden Meadows Project can be achieved and that its other corporate activities will proceed as expected; that the current price and demand for gold will be sustained or will improve; that general business and economic conditions will not change in a materially adverse manner and that all necessary governmental approvals for the planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project will be obtained in a timely manner and on acceptable terms; the continuity of the price of gold and other metals, economic and political conditions and operations. Forward-Looking Information involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the Forward-Looking Information. Such risks and other factors include, among others, risks related to the availability of financing on commercially reasonable terms and the expected use of proceeds; operations and contractual obligations; changes in exploration programs based upon results of exploration; changes in estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources; future prices of metals; availability of third party contractors; availability of equipment; failure of equipment to operate as anticipated; accidents, effects of weather and other natural phenomena and other risks associated with the mineral exploration industry; environmental risks, including environmental matters under U.S. federal and Idaho rules and regulations; impact of environmental remediation requirements and the terms of existing and potential consent decrees on the Corporation’s planned exploration on the Golden Meadows Project; certainty of mineral title; community relations; delays in obtaining governmental approvals or financing; fluctuations in mineral prices; the Corporation’s dependence on one mineral project; the nature of mineral exploration and mining and the uncertain commercial viability of certain mineral deposits; the Corporation’s lack of operating revenues; governmental regulations and the ability to obtain necessary licences and permits; risks related to mineral properties being subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims and other defects in title; currency fluctuations; changes in environmental laws and regulations and changes in the application of standards pursuant to existing laws and regulations which may increase costs of doing business and restrict operations; risks related to dependence on key personnel; and estimates used in financial statements proving to be incorrect; as well as those factors discussed in the Corporation’s public disclosure record. Although the Corporation has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Corporation and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that Forward-Looking Information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information.

Except as required by law, the Corporation does not assume any obligation to release publicly any revisions to Forward-Looking Information contained in this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Mineral Resource Estimate(1) - All Three Deposits comprising the Golden Meadows Project, Idaho
Prepared by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., June 25, 2012

	Hangar Flats	West End (5)	Yellow Pine	All Deposits
Oxides(2) (@ 0.42g/t Au cut-off)
Indicated
Tonnes(000s)	750	8,251	1,572	10,573
GoldGrade (g/t)	0.73	0.83	1.30	0.90
SilverGrade (g/t)	-		-	-
AntimonyGrade (%) (4)	-		0.00%	0.00%
ContainedGold (000s oz)	18	221	66	305
ContainedSilver (000s oz)	-		-	-
ContainedAntimony (000s lbs)	-		122	122
Inferred
Tonnes(000s)	589	1,185	427	2,201
GoldGrade (g/t)	0.82	0.63	2.12	0.97
SilverGrade (g/t)	-		-	-
AntimonyGrade (%) (4)	-		0.02%	0.00%
ContainedGold (000s oz)	15	24	29	68
ContainedSilver (000s oz)	-		-	-
ContainedAntimony (000s lbs)	-		178	178
Sulphides(3) (@ 0.75g/t Au cut-off)
Indicated
Tonnes(000s)	16,440	25,750	25,463	67,653
GoldGrade (g/t)	1.73	1.52	2.14	1.80
SilverGrade (g/t)	1.37		0.72	0.60
AntimonyGrade (%) (4)	0.12%		0.11%	0.07%
ContainedGold (000s oz)	914	1,262	1,749	3,925
ContainedSilver (000s oz)	725		587	1,312
ContainedAntimony (000s lbs)	44,217		64,168	108,385
Inferred
Tonnes(000s)	7,828	14,076	32,013	53,917
GoldGrade (g/t)	1.50	1.30	1.80	1.63
SilverGrade (g/t)	0.09		1.54	0.93
AntimonyGrade (%) (4)	0.02%		0.13%	0.08%
ContainedGold (000s oz)	378	588	1,856	2,822
ContainedSilver (000s oz)	22		1,581	1,603
ContainedAntimony (000s lbs)	3,106		89,500	92,606
Oxides+ Sulphides (2)(3)
Indicated
Tonnes(000s)	17,189	34,001	27,036	78,226
GoldGrade (g/t)	1.69	1.36	2.09	1.68
SilverGrade (g/t)	1.31	-	0.68	0.52
AntimonyGrade (%) (4)	0.12%	-	0.11%	0.06%
ContainedGold (000s oz)	932	1,483	1,814	4,229
ContainedSilver (000s oz)	725	-	587	1,312
ContainedAntimony (000s lbs)	44,217	-	64,290	108,507
Inferred
Tonnes(000s)	8,416	15,261	32,440	56,117
GoldGrade (g/t)	1.45	1.25	1.81	1.60
SilverGrade (g/t)	0.08	-	1.52	0.89
AntimonyGrade (%) (4)	0.02%	-	0.13%	0.07%
ContainedGold (000s oz)	393	612	1,885	2,890
ContainedSilver (000s oz)	22	-	1,581	1,603
ContainedAntimony (000s lbs)	3,106	-	89,678	92,784

(1) Mineral resources are reported in relation to a conceptual pit shell. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability - see “Compliance with NI43-101” below. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate. All composites have been capped where appropriate.
(2) Open pit oxide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.42 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details above).
(3) Open pit sulfide mineral resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.75 g/t Au. Cut-off grades are based on a price of US$1,400 per ounce of gold and a number of operating cost and recovery assumptions, plus a 15% contingency (see details above).
(4) Where antimony grades are shown as “0.00” there is antimony present but it rounds to 0.00, where blank, antimony was not estimated.
(5) Antimony and silver were not estimated for the West End deposit due to a lack of sufficient assays, and is averaged into the totals at an assumed zero grade.

MIDAS GOLD TO PRESENT ITS GOLDEN MEADOWS PROJECT AT IDAHO DAY IN TORONTO JUNE 5, 2012

Idaho Delegation Includes Lt. Governor Brad Little & Former Governor Cecil D. Andrus

VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - Midas Gold Corp. (MAX:TSX) is pleased to be presenting highlights of its Golden Meadows Project in Idaho at a one day “Idaho Day in Toronto” conference being held on June 5, 2012 at the Trump International Hotel. Idaho Day is co-sponsored by several mining companies active in Idaho and a number of leading national and international brokerage firms. The Idaho delegation is led by Idaho’s Lieutenant Governor Brad Little and former Governor Cecil D. Andrus, Idaho’s longest serving governor, who also spent four years as US Secretary of the Interior.

“The Idaho Day in Toronto conference provides a unique opportunity for investors and analysts to get a first-hand account of the importance of the mining industry to the State of Idaho and of its unique regulatory environment,” said Stephen Quin, President and CEO of Midas Gold Corp. “As a leading exploration company active in Idaho, Midas Gold is proud to be co-sponsoring this event.”

Any investor or analyst interested in attending this event in downtown Toronto tomorrow should contact Midas Gold’s Manager of Investor Relations, whose contact details are below.

About Midas Gold and the Golden Meadows Project

Midas Gold Corp., through its wholly owned subsidiaries Midas Gold Inc. and Idaho Gold Resources, LLC, is focused on the exploration and, if warranted, development of the Golden Meadows Project in the Stibnite-Yellow Pine district of central Idaho, a world class gold deposit with significant potential for by-products of antimony and silver, and potentially tungsten. The principal deposits identified to date within the Golden Meadows Project are the Hangar Flats, West End and Yellow Pine deposits, all of which are associated with important structural corridors. Independent mineral resource estimates were detailed in a consolidated technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on Mineral Resources, Golden Meadows Project, Valley County, Idaho” dated June 6, 2011 (the “Technical Report”) is available on Midas Gold’s website at www.midasgoldcorp.com or under Midas Gold’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Updates to those mineral resource estimates were announced for West End on May 16, 2012 and for the Yellow Pine deposit on June 4, 2012 including significant increases in contained gold, while an update for the Hangar Flats deposit is pending. A new technical report covering all three updated mineral resources will be filed on SEDAR in conjunction with the completion of a preliminary economic assessment, scheduled for completion in Q3/12.